انعطاف پذیری شهری
ترجمه نشده

انعطاف پذیری شهری

عنوان فارسی مقاله: تعریف نقشه راه به سمت انعطاف پذیری شهری
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله: Defining the roadmap towards city resilience
مجله/کنفرانس: پیش بینی فناورانه و تغییرات اجتماعی – Technological Forecasting and Social Change
رشته های تحصیلی مرتبط: شهرسازی
گرایش های تحصیلی مرتبط: طراحی شهری، مدیریت شهری
کلمات کلیدی فارسی: انعطاف پذیری شهری، فرآیند تولید محتوا، مدل تکامل، سیاست های انعطاف پذیری، روش دلفی
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی: City resilience، Co-creation process، Maturity model، Resilience policies، Delphi method
نوع نگارش مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی (Research Article)
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.05.019
دانشگاه: University of Navarra, TECNUN, Spain
صفحات مقاله انگلیسی: 16
ناشر: الزویر - Elsevier
نوع ارائه مقاله: ژورنال
نوع مقاله: ISI
سال انتشار مقاله: 2019
ایمپکت فاکتور: 4.852 در سال 2018
شاخص H_index: 93 در سال 2019
شاخص SJR: 1.422 در سال 2018
شناسه ISSN: 0040-1625
شاخص Quartile (چارک): Q1 در سال 2018
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی: PDF
وضعیت ترجمه: ترجمه نشده است
قیمت مقاله انگلیسی: رایگان
آیا این مقاله بیس است: خیر
آیا این مقاله مدل مفهومی دارد: ندارد
آیا این مقاله پرسشنامه دارد: ندارد
آیا این مقاله متغیر دارد: ندارد
کد محصول: E13336
رفرنس: دارای رفرنس در داخل متن و انتهای مقاله
فهرست مطالب (انگلیسی)

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. State of the art

3. Research methodology

4. Results obtained during the co-creation process

5. The Smart Mature Resilience Maturity Model

6. Conclusions

Acknowledgement

References

بخشی از مقاله (انگلیسی)

Abstract

A growing majority of the world’s population lives in cities, and the concentration of people and critical services in cities increases their exposure to acute shocks and long-term stresses. Therefore, building resilient cities that are able to resist and absorb threats and are capable of adapting to and recovering from shocks and stresses is vital for the wellbeing of society. Although the literature offers several studies on how city resilience can be improved, operationalizing resilience is still a challenge. This article describes the different phases of the cocreation process followed in the development of a maturity model that can guide cities in assessing and future improving their resilience level. This co-creation process was conducted using different methodologies involving an interdisciplinary group of international experts who contributed their knowledge and experience to the development process of the maturity model. The outcome of this process is the final version of a maturity model that operationalizes the steps that should be taken to build city resilience.

Introduction

The world is experiencing the largest wave of urban growth in history. Over half of the world’s population is now living in cities and according to the United Nations estimates, by 2050, 66% of the total world’s population is expected to be urban (UN, 2014). With this rapid urbanization, cities are facing a variety of acute shocks derived from natural disasters and long-term stresses, such as the effects of climate change (Harrison and Williams, 2016; UNISDR, 2015a). Therefore, there is a need for cities to implement policies for increasing resilience and improving preparedness to cope with both acute shocks and longterm stresses (Spaans and Waterhout, 2017). The concept of resilience has been applied in many different disciplines such as climate change, disaster risk reduction, and planning (Peng et al., 2017). This research considers resilience as a transversal capacity to deal with all kind of threats, expected and unexpected. Resilience goes beyond traditional risk management approach and it does not only take into account the type of threats towards the city is already preparing for but it is also focused on developing preventive and adaptive capacities to deal with any kind of unexpected threats (Park et al., 2013; Risk and Resilience Research Group – Center for Security Studies, 2011). Making cities resilient to shocks and stresses in order to ensure the welfare of society has become a major concern for academics, emergency management practitioners and governments (Chmutina et al., 2016).