سازماندهی و مدیریت مرزها
ترجمه نشده

سازماندهی و مدیریت مرزها

عنوان فارسی مقاله: سازماندهی و مدیریت مرزها: دیدگاه ساختاری از همکاری با مدل سازی اطلاعات ساختمان (BIM)
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله: Organising and Managing boundaries: A structurational view of collaboration with Building Information Modelling (BIM)
مجله/کنفرانس: مجله بین المللی مدیریت پروژه – International Journal of Project Management
رشته های تحصیلی مرتبط: مدیریت - مهندسی عمران
گرایش های تحصیلی مرتبط: مدیریت پروژه، مدیریت ساخت
کلمات کلیدی فارسی: نظریه مرز، مدل سازی اطلاعات ساختمان (BIM)، همکاری، ساختار بندی، دیجیتال
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی: Boundary theory, Building Information Modelling (BIM), Collaboration, Digital, Structuration
نوع نگارش مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی (Research Article)
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2019.01.010
دانشگاه: University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London WC1E 7HB, United Kingdom
صفحات مقاله انگلیسی: 17
ناشر: الزویر - Elsevier
نوع ارائه مقاله: ژورنال
نوع مقاله: ISI
سال انتشار مقاله: 2019
ایمپکت فاکتور: 4.650 در سال 2017
شاخص H_index: 110 در سال 2019
شاخص SJR: 1.463 در سال 2017
شناسه ISSN: 0263-7863
شاخص Quartile (چارک): Q1 در سال 2017
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی: PDF
وضعیت ترجمه: ترجمه نشده است
قیمت مقاله انگلیسی: رایگان
آیا این مقاله بیس است: خیر
کد محصول: E11972
فهرست مطالب (انگلیسی)

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Theoretical basis and knowledge gap

3. Methodology

4. Data presentation and findings

5. Discussion

6. Conclusions

References

بخشی از مقاله (انگلیسی)

Abstract

The construction industry is currently undergoing digital transformation due to emerging technologies. Hence new forms of organisation are needed. Collaborating with Building Information Modelling (BIM) is complex and challenges the management of projects. The ubiquitous digital information sharing among multi-disciplinary actors in BIM-based projects, activates dense inter-organisational processes. This study offers insights into collaboration with BIM, through the theoretical lens of boundaries. By analysing two projects of BIM-based collaboration in the Netherlands, the interplay between structure and agency of collaboration was discussed. The various artefacts of BIM, as boundary objects were interpreted in multiple ways by different communities of practice and this resulted in poor communication and consequently poor collaboration. The findings challenge the prevalent view of BIM as a software artefact and showed that this view only partially supports collaboration. Additionally, a structurational view (enabled by communication, conflict management, negotiation, and teamwork) as opposed to a structural view of collaboration (e.g. BIM as a software) can fully support the implementation of digital innovations. Finally, the paper revealed a ‘tactical gap’ in the implementation of digital between strategic and operational decision-making needs fine-tuning to ensure better collaboration in projects where digital innovations are adopted. The study concludes with propositions for supporting organisation of teams through integration of activities and the management of BIM-based collaboration in projects beyond merely structural and technological approaches, which dominate the field but from a structurational view instead.