مکانیسم های مدیریت پروژه
ترجمه نشده

مکانیسم های مدیریت پروژه

عنوان فارسی مقاله: مکانیسم های مدیریت پروژه و عملکرد پروژه های توسعه ی نرم افزاری: نقش مدیریت ریسک الزامات
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله: Project governance mechanisms and the performance of software development projects: Moderating role of requirements risk
مجله/کنفرانس: مجله بین المللی مدیریت پروژه-International Journal of Project Management
رشته های تحصیلی مرتبط: مدیریت، مهندسی کامپیوتر، مهندسی فناوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات
گرایش های تحصیلی مرتبط: مدیریت پروژه، مدیریت فناوری اطلاعات، مهندسی نرم افزار، اینترنت و شبکه های گسترده
کلمات کلیدی فارسی: مدیریت قراردادی، مدیریت ارتباطی، فرصت طلبی، عملکرد پروژه، ریسک الزامات، صنعت فناوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی: Contractual governance; Relational governance; Opportunism; Project performance; Requirements risk; IT industry
نوع نگارش مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی (Research Article)
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2019.02.008
دانشگاه: School of Management, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, Anhui 230009, PR China
صفحات مقاله انگلیسی: 16
ناشر: الزویر - Elsevier
نوع ارائه مقاله: ژورنال
نوع مقاله: ISI
سال انتشار مقاله: 2019
ایمپکت فاکتور: 5.979 در سال 2018
شاخص H_index: 121 در سال 2019
شاخص SJR: 2.203 در سال 2018
شناسه ISSN: 0263-7863
شاخص Quartile (چارک): Q1 در سال 2018
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی: PDF
وضعیت ترجمه: ترجمه نشده است
قیمت مقاله انگلیسی: رایگان
آیا این مقاله بیس است: بله
آیا این مقاله مدل مفهومی دارد: دارد
آیا این مقاله پرسشنامه دارد: ندارد
آیا این مقاله متغیر دارد: دارد
کد محصول: E12200
رفرنس: دارای رفرنس در داخل متن و انتهای مقاله
فهرست مطالب (انگلیسی)

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Theoretical background

3. Methodology

4. Data analysis and results

5. Discussion

Acknowledgments

Appendix 1. Survey instrument and factor loadings

References

بخشی از مقاله (انگلیسی)

Abstract

Over the years, practitioners and academicians have been perplexed by low efficiency and poor performance in IT projects. Previous studies have uncovered a variety of critical factors, including effective project governance mechanisms that can trigger project performance and curb opportunism. However, an obvious question that emerges is how effective these governance mechanisms are at improving the performance of an IT organization and software development project in the presence of risk factors. Hence, the overarching objective of the current study is the development of a moderation model to investigate the effectiveness of these governance mechanisms in the presence of requirements risk. This paper follows a positivist research philosophy where a quantitative deductive approach has been used to collect the data of 318 respondents from 175 software development firms based in Pakistan. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) through SmartPLS 3 have been used to analyze the hypotheses. The results of the study indicate that contractual and relational governances significantly influence project performance and are useful in reducing opportunism. Moreover, there is evidence that the presence of requirements risk tends to negatively moderate the influence of contractual and relational governances on project performance. The findings will help not only Pakistan’s software firms, but also those in developing countries that want to improve performance through effective project governance and risk management.

Introduction

Over the years, practitioners and researchers have been perplexed by low efficiency and poor performance in projectbased organizations (Marnewick et al., 2018; Borgstein et al., 2018; Liu, 2015). Enhancing the performance of software development projects is not only the aim of the industry, but also an important factor in the field of project management. Over the past few years, researchers and academicians have focused on studying the role of governance mechanisms in the field of project management as well as predictors of better performance. The governance mechanisms that are mainly reported in the recent literature can be divided into two categories: contractual governance and relational governance. Contractual governance is primarily focused on following formal rules and highlighting the importance of agreements and written contracts pertaining to the transactions between two parties (Lusch and Brown, 1996; Reuer and Ariño, 2007; Lumineau et al., 2011; Ke et al., 2015).