دانلود مقاله خودآزاری و پرخاشگری در اوایل سنین نوجوانی
خلاصه
مقدمه
روش
معیارهای
استراتژی تحلیل داده ها
نتایج
تجزیه و تحلیل انتقال پنهان
بحث
نتیجه
رعایت استانداردهای اخلاقی
منابع
Abstract
Introduction
Method
Measures
Data Analytic Strategy
Results
Latent Transition Analysis
Discussion
Conclusion
Compliance with Ethical Standards
References
چکیده
خودآزاری و پرخاشگری به طور قابل توجهی در اوایل نوجوانی افزایش می یابد. با این حال، مطالعات کمی این رفتارهای مضر را به طور همزمان در نظر گرفته است. این مطالعه از یک رویکرد شخص محور برای شناسایی نیمرخ نوجوانانی استفاده کرد که در الگوهای خودآزاری، پرخاشگری واکنشی و پرخاشگری فعالانه متفاوت بودند، ثبات این الگوها را بررسی کرد، و تأثیر قربانی شدن قلدری را بر عضویت در نمایه پنهان و گذار بررسی کرد. . در مجموع 2463 نوجوان اولیه (48.8٪ دختر، Mage = 13.93 0.59) در دو موج مطالعه در طول شش ماه شرکت کردند. نتایج نشان داد که نیمرخ علائم کم (4/80 درصد)، پرخاشگری متوسط (2/14 درصد)، پرخاشگری بالا (0/3 درصد) و نیمرخ خودآزاری بالا (4/2 درصد) در زمان 1 و نیمرخ علائم کم (1/82 درصد) شناسایی شدند. درصد، نیمرخ آسیب دوگانه (7.6 درصد)، پرخاشگری بالا (7.7 درصد)، و پروفایل خودآزاری بالا (2.6 درصد) در زمان 2 شناسایی شد. نوجوانانی که به پروفایل های در معرض خطر اختصاص داده شده بودند، انتقال متوسط به بالا را نشان دادند. ناهمگونی رشدی خودآزاری و پرخاشگری. علاوه بر این، نوجوانانی که قربانی قلدری بالایی داشتند، بیشتر به پروفایل های در معرض خطر تعلق داشتند یا در حال گذار بودند. یافته ها ماهیت همزمان و انتقالی خودآزاری و پرخاشگری و نقش فراتشخیصی قربانی قلدری را نشان داد که می تواند برای هدایت راهبردهای پیشگیری و مداخله استفاده شود.
توجه! این متن ترجمه ماشینی بوده و توسط مترجمین ای ترجمه، ترجمه نشده است.
Abstract
Self-harm and aggression increase markedly during early adolescence. However, few studies considered these harmful behaviors simultaneously. This study employed a person-centered approach to identify profiles of adolescents who differed in their patterns of self-harm, reactive aggression, and proactive aggression, examined the stability of these patterns, and explored the effect of bullying victimization on latent profile membership and transition. A total of 2463 early adolescents (48.8% girls, Mage = 13.93 ± 0.59) participated in two waves of the study over six months. The results indicated that low symptoms profile (80.4%), moderate aggression profile (14.2%), high aggression profile (3.0%), and high self-harm profile (2.4%) were identified at time 1, and low symptoms profile (82.1%), dual-harm profile (7.6%), high aggression profile (7.7%), and high self-harm profile (2.6%) were identified at time 2. Adolescents assigned to at-risk profiles showed moderate to high transition, suggesting the developmental heterogeneity of self-harm and aggression. Moreover, adolescents high in bullying victimization were more likely to belong or transition to at-risk profiles. The findings revealed the co-occurring and transitional nature of self-harm and aggression and the transdiagnostic role of bullying victimization, which can be used to guide prevention and intervention strategies.
Introduction
Self-harm and aggression during adolescence are important public health issues. According to a representative survey conducted in China (Wan et al., 2011), 17.0% of adolescents and young adults reported that they had harmed themselves deliberately in the past 12 months. Similarly, about 9.0% to 24.3% of Chinese children and adolescents exhibited aggressive behaviors (Han et al., 2017; Huang et al., 2017). Self-harm and aggression can have detrimental effects on adolescents’ development and mental health outcomes (Hawton et al., 2012; Hubbard et al., 2010). Most existing studies have typically focused on either self-harm or aggression, far fewer studies explored the combination of these two harmful behaviors. Indeed, relevant research has suggested that self-harm and aggression are linked (O’Donnell et al., 2015; Shafti et al., 2021). The coexistence of aggressive and self-harming behavior within the same individual has been recently termed “dual harm” (Slade, 2019). Individuals who engage in dual-harm may represent a highrisk group with unique characteristics and patterns of harmful behaviors (Shafti et al., 2021). To better understand the cooccurrent nature of self-harm and aggression, the current study employed a person-centered approach to determine profiles of co-occurring self-harm, reactive aggression, and proactive aggression, their short-term stability and change, and the role of bullying victimization on behavioral profiles and their transitions among Chinese early adolescents.
Conclusion
The coexistence of self-harm and aggression has received increasing attention recently. However, the scientific knowledge about co-occurring types of self-harm and aggression and their developmental process among adolescents was scarce. Further, understanding the antecedents that affected the stability and transition of behavioral patterns could be a key step for prevention and early intervention. The current research employed a person-centered approach to reveal the co-occurring and transitory nature of self-harm, reactive aggression, and proactive aggression among early adolescents, while also demonstrating how bullying victimization influenced the stability and transition of these behavioral patterns. It was found that there was a small subgroup of adolescents for whom self-harm and reactive aggression co-occur. Adolescents with low levels of selfharm and aggression exhibited a stable pattern, while adolescents in at-risk subgroups showed varying degrees of transitional patterns, indicating that self-harm and aggression change dramatically during early adolescence. Moreover, adolescents high in bullying victimization were more likely to be classified in and transition toward at-risk profiles. These findings can be used to guide prevention and intervention strategies for reducing self-harm and aggression.