مقاله انگلیسی تفکر انتقادی در آموزش حسابداری
ترجمه نشده

مقاله انگلیسی تفکر انتقادی در آموزش حسابداری

عنوان فارسی مقاله: تفکر انتقادی در آموزش حسابداری: وضعیت و دعوت به عمل
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله: Critical thinking in accounting education: Status and call to action
مجله/کنفرانس: مجله آموزش حسابداری - Journal of Accounting Education
رشته های تحصیلی مرتبط: حسابداری
گرایش های تحصیلی مرتبط: حسابداری مالی
کلمات کلیدی فارسی: تفکر انتقادی ، قضاوت حرفه ای ، رشد شناختی ، قضاوت تأملی ، طبقه بندی بلوم ، مهارت های نرم
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی: Critical thinking, Professional judgment, Cognitive development, Reflective judgment, Bloom’s taxonomy, Soft skills
نوع نگارش مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی (Research Article)
نمایه: scopus
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2021.100731
دانشگاه: University of Texas, United States
صفحات مقاله انگلیسی: 19
ناشر: الزویر - Elsevier
نوع ارائه مقاله: ژورنال
نوع مقاله: ISI
سال انتشار مقاله: 2021
ایمپکت فاکتور: 2.760 در سال 2020
شاخص H_index: 32 در سال 2021
شاخص SJR: 0.481 در سال 2020
شناسه ISSN: 0748-5751
شاخص Quartile (چارک): Q2 در سال 2020
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی: PDF
وضعیت ترجمه: ترجمه نشده است
قیمت مقاله انگلیسی: رایگان
آیا این مقاله بیس است: خیر
آیا این مقاله مدل مفهومی دارد: ندارد
آیا این مقاله پرسشنامه دارد: ندارد
آیا این مقاله متغیر دارد: ندارد
کد محصول: E15410
رفرنس: دارای رفرنس در داخل متن و انتهای مقاله
نوع رفرنس دهی: vancouver
فهرست مطالب (انگلیسی)

Highlights

Abstract

Keywords

1. Introduction

2. Critical thinking stakeholder expectations, definitions, and learning objectives

3. Student learning experiences for critical thinking

4. Cognitive models and critical thinking

5. Cognitive development

6. Reflective judgment model

7. Obstacles to critical thinking development

8. Final thoughts

Acknowledgements

Funding

References

بخشی از مقاله (انگلیسی)

Abstract

For many years, accounting education research has highlighted the need for students to develop stronger critical thinking skills. This need has become even more imperative as the accounting profession continues to transition, and entry-level accountants are expected to demonstrate stronger critical thinking skills earlier in their careers. In this paper, we revisit the higher education literature to identify key recommendations for accounting education to simultaneously develop desired critical thinking skills and accounting technical knowledge. Based on existing research in higher education, we recommend that accounting educators apply a model of cognitive development—the reflective judgment model—to better understand students’ thinking and to design and employ more effective learning activities. To encourage adoption of this approach, we summarize existing accounting education recommendations for improved critical thinking education. Although we believe that these recommendations are beneficial, we recognize that only limited accounting education research supports the ideas presented here. Accordingly, we propose calls to action for additional research in this area. Our students need for us to identify and adopt educational practices to generate graduates who have the critical thinking skills required by our rapidly-changing profession. To meet this need, researchers should actively engage in activities to fill the gap in empirical data about the development of students’ critical thinking skills throughout the accounting curriculum. Also, accounting departments and faculty need to support both educational research and improved learning design.

 

1. Introduction

There have been repeated calls for greater critical thinking ability among accounting graduates, and current changes in the profession require strong critical thinking earlier in an accountant’s career (e.g., Gupta & Marshall, 2010). Despite these repeated calls, Pincus et al. (2017) point out that little educational progress has been made. To encourage and assist in a greater focus on critical thinking, professional organizations are providing competency frameworks and critical thinking resources (discussed below). Nevertheless, a continuing question is whether educational efforts are sufficient to meet the needs of students and the profession. Moreover, questions have arisen about whether critical thinking can be taught and about the effectiveness of education efforts (e.g., Rebele & St. Pierre, 2019).