رویکردهای تحلیل پرورشی مورد استفاده در دوره های حسابرسی دوم
ترجمه نشده

رویکردهای تحلیل پرورشی مورد استفاده در دوره های حسابرسی دوم

عنوان فارسی مقاله: رویکردهای تحلیل پرورشی مورد استفاده در دوره های حسابرسی دوم
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله: Analyzing pedagogical approaches used in second auditing courses
مجله/کنفرانس: پیشرفت در حسابداری - Advances in Accounting
رشته های تحصیلی مرتبط: حسابداری
گرایش های تحصیلی مرتبط: حسابرسی
کلمات کلیدی فارسی: آموزش حسابرسی، توسعه دوره، محتوای دوره، تعلیم
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی: Auditing education، Course development، Course content، Pedagogy
نوع نگارش مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی (Research Article)
نمایه: scopus
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2018.05.001
دانشگاه: Mike Ilitch School of Business - Wayne State University - United States
صفحات مقاله انگلیسی: 15
ناشر: الزویر - Elsevier
نوع ارائه مقاله: ژورنال
نوع مقاله: ISI
سال انتشار مقاله: 2018
ایمپکت فاکتور: 0/672 در سال 2017
شاخص H_index: 20 در سال 2019
شاخص SJR: 0/277 در سال 2017
شناسه ISSN: 0882-6110
شاخص Quartile (چارک): Q3 در سال 2017
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی: PDF
وضعیت ترجمه: ترجمه نشده است
قیمت مقاله انگلیسی: رایگان
آیا این مقاله بیس است: خیر
کد محصول: E10834
فهرست مطالب (انگلیسی)

Abstract

1- Introduction and background

2- Research instrument

3- Results and discussion

4- Recommendation and conclusion

References

بخشی از مقاله (انگلیسی)

Abstract

To help professors develop, design and improve second auditing classes, we surveyed members of the American Accounting Association's Auditing Section to identify programs that offer second auditing courses, the textbooks used for such courses, and the learning activities used. Total and second auditing course only respondents (n = 252 and n = 80, respectively) identified university, program, and auditing course demographics, while second auditing course respondents identified the classroom activities that extend the second auditing course beyond the basics found in textbooks. Results reveal the textbooks used for first and second auditing courses, learning objectives, website resources, manual and computerized cases, group projects, software programs, video presentations, supplementary materials, and an analysis of national syllabi. These results, drawn from a diverse group of institutions, can serve as a resource to help professors develop and improve the content for a second auditing course.

Introduction

and background While introductory auditing courses generally cover similar topics, we see much diversity in the content of second (usually advanced) auditing courses. Little recent research exists on this topic. Given a rapidly changing business environment due to a proliferation of regulations and increased use of information technology, an updated study on what is and should be covered in second auditing courses can help faculty members develop and improve second auditing courses. To improve students' long-term career prospects, Lawson et al.'s (2014) educational framework develops competencies, not courses, to encompass broadly all accounting disciplines such as financial, management, taxation, information systems and assurance. The competencies are based upon The Pathways Commission Framework (2012) and include foundational, broad management, and accounting competencies. Ultimately, developing accounting competencies (e.g. external reporting and professional ethics) should consider both foundational competencies (communication, quantitative, analytical thinking/problem solving, interpersonal, and technological) and broad management competencies (leadership; ethics/social responsibility; process management and improvement; governance, risk and compliance; plus others). Key business failures led to the passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) in 2002 that greatly impacted the auditing profession. The postSOX auditing environment demands auditors to better grasp risk assessment, including fraud risk assessment. Students must grasp, document, and link internal controls to draw conclusions related to assertions, audit evidence, and fraud risk assessment. Teaching these skills will impact the content of both the first and second auditing courses, plus change the core business and accounting curriculum (Arens & Elder, 2006).