مالیات جهانی و ادغام و مالکیت داخلی
ترجمه نشده

مالیات جهانی و ادغام و مالکیت داخلی

عنوان فارسی مقاله: “U.S. مالیات جهانی و ادغام و مالکیت داخلی “یک بحث
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله: “U.S. worldwide taxation and domestic mergers and acquisitions” a discussion
مجله/کنفرانس: مجله حسابداری و اقتصاد - Journal of Accounting and Economics
رشته های تحصیلی مرتبط: حسابداری
گرایش های تحصیلی مرتبط: حسابداری مالی، حسابداری مالیاتی
کلمات کلیدی فارسی: هزینه های بازگشت مالیات، ادغام و تملک، مالکیت داخلی
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی: Repatriation tax costs، M&A، Domestic acquisitions
نوع نگارش مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی (Research Article)
نمایه: Scopus - Master Journals List - JCR
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2018.08.013
دانشگاه: C.T. Bauer College of Business, University of Houston, TX, 77204-6021, United States
ناشر: الزویر - Elsevier
نوع ارائه مقاله: ژورنال
نوع مقاله: ISI
سال انتشار مقاله: 2018
ایمپکت فاکتور: 3/891 در سال 2018
شاخص H_index: 132 در سال 2019
شاخص SJR: 6/606 در سال 2018
شناسه ISSN: 0165-4101
شاخص Quartile (چارک): Q1 در سال 2018
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی: PDF
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی: 19
وضعیت ترجمه: ترجمه نشده است
قیمت مقاله انگلیسی: رایگان
آیا این مقاله بیس است: خیر
کد محصول: E11354
فهرست انگلیسی مطالب

Abstract


1- Introduction


2- Comments on the broader question, related literature, and this study


3- Comments on research design and empirical results


4- Other comments


5- Conclusion


References

نمونه متن انگلیسی مقاله

Abstract


Harris and O'Brien (2018) investigate whether U.S. tax policy distorts U.S. multinationals’ (MNCs) investment. They find that MNCs facing higher repatriation tax costs engage in fewer domestic acquisitions. The study re-examines the results in two prior studies that found no effect (Hanlon et al. 2015) and a positive effect (Martin et al. 2015) by introducing a new proxy for repatriation tax costs: A binary variable for whether the MNC uses the Double Irish structure. We critique the theory underlying the prediction as well as the proxy. We conclude that caution should be exercised in taking the results at face value.


Introduction


This study by Harris and O’Brien (2018) examines whether the U.S. worldwide tax system affects domestic investment. 2 More specifically, Harris and O’Brien identify a U.S. multinational firm-initiated repatriation tax increasing event, namely, the establishment and use of a Double Irish structure (hereafter DI), and link DI to domestic mergers and acquisitions (hereafter M&A).3 Because firms adopt DI in different years, the setting can be viewed as a difference-in-differences design with treatment events staggered over time. The authors find that, firms that establish DI experience a decrease in domestic M&A relative to non-DI users. The authors conclude that their evidence is consistent with the worldwide taxation system impeding domestic investment. Harris and O’Brien start by arguing that theoretically we should expect a negative association between repatriation taxes and domestic M&A. Prior studies (Hanlon et al. 2015 and Martin et al. 2015) do not find such a negative relation using a widely accepted repatriation tax proxy, REPAT. The authors attribute the lack of result to the fact that REPAT is confounded by foreign growth. The authors propose DoubleIrish as a “cleaner” measure of repatriation tax rate and argue that it is less likely to be confounded by foreign growth compared to REPAT. The new DoubleIrish measure is the key motivation and innovation of the paper. The authors first validate that the establishment of DI is indeed correlated with increased repatriation tax rates. Next, they show that DoubleIrish is negatively associated with domestic M&A volume and value. The authors also compare and contrast DoubleIrish with REPAT and explain why results differ using the two measures. In Section 2, we begin our discussion with an overview of the broad research question and related literature. We next critique the theory underlying the study’s main prediction. Then we discuss whether it is reasonable to attribute the lack of a negative relation between repatriation taxes and domestic M&A to proxies used. We also discuss and compare DoubleIrish and REPAT in more details in Section 3. Finally, because of concerns about the construct validity of the DoubleIrish proxy, we caution the reader not to take the results at face value.

  • اشتراک گذاری در

دیدگاه خود را بنویسید:

تاکنون دیدگاهی برای این نوشته ارسال نشده است

مالیات جهانی و ادغام و مالکیت داخلی
نوشته های مرتبط
مقالات جدید
لوگوی رسانه های برخط

logo-samandehi

پیوندها