مقایسه عملکرد عایق حرارتی پانل های عایق خلا با لایه های محافظ EPS
ترجمه نشده

مقایسه عملکرد عایق حرارتی پانل های عایق خلا با لایه های محافظ EPS

عنوان فارسی مقاله: مقایسه عملکرد عایق حرارتی پانل های عایق خلا با لایه های محافظ EPS که با روش های مختلف اندازه گیری شده است
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله: Comparison of thermal insulation performance of vacuum insulation panels with EPS protection layers measured with different methods
مجله/کنفرانس: ساختمان ها و انرژی - Energy & Buildings
رشته های تحصیلی مرتبط: مهندسی عمران و انرژی
گرایش های تحصیلی مرتبط: مدیریت ساخت، فناوری انرژی، سیستم های انرژی
کلمات کلیدی فارسی: روش هات باکس، ارزش U، پانل های عایق، خلا عایق حرارتی
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی: Hot box method - U-value - Vacuum insulation panels - Thermal insulation
نوع نگارش مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی (Research Article)
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.110771
دانشگاه: University of Debrecen, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Building Services and Building Engineering, Hungar
صفحات مقاله انگلیسی: 12
ناشر: الزویر - Elsevier
نوع ارائه مقاله: ژورنال
نوع مقاله: ISI
سال انتشار مقاله: 2021
ایمپکت فاکتور: 5.869 در سال 2020
شاخص H_index: 166 در سال 2021
شاخص SJR: 2.061 در سال 2020
شناسه ISSN: 0378-7788
شاخص Quartile (چارک): Q1 در سال 2020
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی: PDF
وضعیت ترجمه: ترجمه نشده است
قیمت مقاله انگلیسی: رایگان
آیا این مقاله بیس است: خیر
آیا این مقاله مدل مفهومی دارد: ندارد
آیا این مقاله پرسشنامه دارد: ندارد
آیا این مقاله متغیر دارد: ندارد
کد محصول: E15270
رفرنس: دارای رفرنس در داخل متن و انتهای مقاله
فهرست مطالب (ترجمه)

نکات برجسته

خلاصه

چکیده گرافیکی

کلید واژه ها

نامگذاری

1. مقدمه

2. مواد و روش ها

3. نتایج و بحث

4. نتیجه گیری

بیانیه مشارکت نویسندگی CRediT

اعلامیه منافع رقابتی

سپاسگزاریها

منابع

فهرست مطالب (انگلیسی)

Highlights

Abstract

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Nomenclature

1. Introduction

2. Materials and methods

3. Results and discussion

4. Conclusions

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Declaration of Competing Interest

Acknowledgements

References

بخشی از مقاله (انگلیسی)

Abstract

For reducing the energy use of buildings, the application of insulation materials can be a possible solution to improve energy efficiency. However, with the continuously tightening regulations, thicker and thicker insulations should be used (e.g., up to 20–25 cm in Hungary and about 40–50 cm in the Nordic countries) to fulfil the directives. In the past decades, developmental research started to focus on both decreasing the thickness and decreasing the thermal conductivity of materials parallels. With this research direction, the investigations of the new type of insulation materials took place. The use of materials having thermal conductivity with less than 0.020 W/mK spread over. These materials are the so-called super insulation materials. Besides Vacuum Insulation Panels (VIPs), aerogel-based materials belong to this group, too. This paper will present laboratory tests executed on two altered types of protected Vacuum Insulation Panels: a one side and a 2 side protected VIP, also called Vacuum Insulation Sandwich (VIS). The first one, type “A” contains 20 mm thick laminated fumed silica, covered with 10 mm thick expanded polystyrene on one side, while type “B” was the one where the 10 mm thick laminated fumed silica core was packed between two 10 mm thick EPS slabs. Firstly, thermal insulation performance was investigated by the so-called guarded hot-box method for U-value, where the samples were placed on a solid brick wall. Furthermore, the thermal insulation performance of protected VIPs was also tested with Hukseflux heat flux plates. To reveal the applicability limits caused by the thermal bridges infrared thermography images (IR) were taken, too. From the images and the measurement results, a theory was formed regarding the heat flow directions inside the encapsulated panels. The current article emphasizes the equivalent thermal conductivity for the assessment of the thermal protection performance of vacuum insulation panels. The paper states that by using VIPs at least, 70% reduction can be reached in the U-value compared to the value of the solid brick wall. Moreover, the paper points out that the use of EPS protection layer on both sides of the VIP has a promising effect by reducing the thermal bridges. Furthermore, the VIP protected with EPS slabs on both sides results in less equivalent thermal conductivity.

1. Introduction

Nowadays, reducing significantly the energy consumption is an important issue for the building sector, but the reduction of energy use cannot neglect the thermal comfort requirements. Heating and cooling account for at least 40% of the final energy use of the European Union. Moreover, it was predicted by the International Energy Agency (IEA) by the energy use of the countries all over the world could reach up the unwanted 50% until the year 2030 [1–3]. That is why the application of thermal insulation materials in the buildings is very significant. Several types of insulation materials are available [4], but nowadays the use of super insulation materials (SIM) is also widespread, resulted in the development of the industry sector [5]. In cases where greater thickness (15 ~ 20 cm) cannot be used, materials with less thermal conductivity must be applied. It is mentionable that there is no exact definition of SIMs but the IEA EBC Annex 65 ‘‘SIM” Subtask 1 [6] defines the elements of these groups. According to this Annex, these materials are said to be the part of this group: (a) Vacuum Insulation Panels (VIP); (b) Advanced Porous Materials (APM), for example, different types of aerogels (monoliths or fibrous ones). Their most important property is the thermal conductivity, possibly less than 0.022 W/ mK [7]. These insulation materials are also called nanostructured materials, due to their nano-sized pore structure [6]. The application limits of these mentioned materials are written in [8,9] but now the vacuum insulation panels will be in focus.