مقاله انگلیسی رسانه های اجتماعی ترس از دست دادن (FoMO) و دعوا
ترجمه نشده

مقاله انگلیسی رسانه های اجتماعی ترس از دست دادن (FoMO) و دعوا

عنوان فارسی مقاله: رسانه های اجتماعی ترس از دست دادن (FoMO) و دعوا: پیامدهای رفتاری، رابطه ای و روانی
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله: Social media induced fear of missing out (FoMO) and phubbing: Behavioural, relational and psychological outcomes
مجله/کنفرانس: پیش بینی فناورانه و تحول اجتماعی - Technological Forecasting & Social Change
رشته های تحصیلی مرتبط: فناوری اطلاعات، مدیریت
گرایش های تحصیلی مرتبط: مدیریت فناوری اطلاعات، اینترنت و شبکه های گسترده
کلمات کلیدی فارسی: رسانه های اجتماعی، ترس از دست دادن، سمت تاریک شبکه های اجتماعی، کارمندان، FoMO ، فوبینگ، نتایج کار
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی: Social media - Fear of missing out - Dark side of social media - Employees - FoMO - Phubbing - Work outcomes
نوع نگارش مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی (Research Article)
نمایه: Scopus - Master Journals List - JCR
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121149
دانشگاه: Department of Management, School of Business & Law, University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway
صفحات مقاله انگلیسی: 15
ناشر: الزویر - Elsevier
نوع ارائه مقاله: ژورنال
نوع مقاله: ISI
سال انتشار مقاله: 2022
ایمپکت فاکتور: 8.593 در سال 2020
شاخص H_index: 117 در سال 2020
شاخص SJR: 2.226 در سال 2020
شناسه ISSN: 0040-1625
شاخص Quartile (چارک): Q1 در سال 2020
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی: PDF
وضعیت ترجمه: ترجمه نشده است
قیمت مقاله انگلیسی: رایگان
آیا این مقاله بیس است: بله
آیا این مقاله مدل مفهومی دارد: دارد
آیا این مقاله پرسشنامه دارد: ندارد
آیا این مقاله متغیر دارد: دارد
آیا این مقاله فرضیه دارد: دارد
کد محصول: E15824
رفرنس: دارای رفرنس در داخل متن و انتهای مقاله
فهرست مطالب (انگلیسی)

Abstract
Keywords
Introduction
Theoretical background
Hypothesis development and research framework
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
acknowledgement
CRediT authorship contribution statement
References
Vitae

بخشی از مقاله (انگلیسی)

Abstract
The penetration of smartphones and the subsequent social media use in modern workplaces have drawn scholars’ attention towards studying their influence on employees. This is a nascent yet critical field of study because initial inquiries have confirmed the significant adverse implications of smartphone and social media use for employee well-being and productivity. Acknowledging the need to better explicate the consequences of the socalled ‘dark side’ of social media use at work, we examine the association of FoMO and phubbing with both psychological (i.e. work exhaustion and creativity) and relational (i.e. workplace incivility) employee outcomes. We tested our proposed hypotheses, which rest on the theoretical tripod of the theory of compensatory Internet use, the limited capacity model and regulatory focus theory, through structural equation modelling (SEM) of data collected from 243 working professionals in the United States (US). The results suggest that FoMO has a positive association with phubbing, which, in turn, is positively associated with both psychological and relational responses. In addition, our analysis reveals the moderation effect of promotion focus on the association between phubbing and creativity. In comparison, we observe no moderation effect for prevention focus on any of the proposed associations. Our findings provide new insights into the impact of smartphone and social media use on employees and offer important implications for theory and practice.
Introduction
The intensive proliferation of information and communication technologies (ICT) over the past decade has altered social and communication norms worldwide leading scholars to discuss the negative effects arising from this event. Turel et al. (2019) refer to this phenomenon as the ‘dark side of digitisation’, which they argue has blurred the boundaries of individuals’ social, personal and professional use. Consequently, scholars have exhibited increasing interest in the ways in which these technologies influence employee behaviour, especially concerning phenomena associated with the dark side of social media, such as the fear of missing out (FoMO; Budnick et al., 2020; Tandon et al., 2020), and smartphones, such as phubbing (Al-Saggaf and Macculloch, 2019; Roberts and David, 2020).