مکانیزم های مختلف بی تفاوتی اخلاقی در ارتباط بین والدین خشن و پرخاشگری نوجوانان
ترجمه نشده

مکانیزم های مختلف بی تفاوتی اخلاقی در ارتباط بین والدین خشن و پرخاشگری نوجوانان

عنوان فارسی مقاله: مکانیزم های مختلف بی تفاوتی اخلاقی به عنوان واسطه های متعدد در ارتباط بین والدین خشن و پرخاشگری نوجوانان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله: Different mechanisms of moral disengagement as multiple mediators in the association between harsh parenting and adolescent aggression
مجله/کنفرانس: شخصیت و تفاوت های فردی - Personality and Individual Differences
رشته های تحصیلی مرتبط: روانشناسی
گرایش های تحصیلی مرتبط: روانشناسی تربیتی، روانشناسی عمومی، روانشناسی رشد
کلمات کلیدی فارسی: والدین خشن ، بی تفاوتی اخلاقی، پرخاشگری
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی: Harsh parenting، Moral disengagement، Aggression
نوع نگارش مقاله: مقاله کوتاه (Short communication)
نمایه: Scopus - Master Journal List - JCR
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.10.037
دانشگاه: Faculty of Education, Qufu Normal University, Qufu 273165, China
ناشر: الزویر - Elsevier
نوع ارائه مقاله: ژورنال
نوع مقاله: ISI
سال انتشار مقاله: 2019
ایمپکت فاکتور: 2/113 در سال 2017
شاخص H_index: 129 در سال 2019
شاخص SJR: 1/181 در سال 2017
شناسه ISSN: 0191-8869
شاخص Quartile (چارک): Q1 در سال 2017
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی: PDF
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی: 4
وضعیت ترجمه: ترجمه نشده است
قیمت مقاله انگلیسی: رایگان
آیا این مقاله بیس است: خیر
کد محصول: E11140
فهرست انگلیسی مطالب

Abstract


1- Introduction


2- Method


3- Results


4- Discussion


References

نمونه متن انگلیسی مقاله

Abstract


The present study examined the different mediating roles of eight mechanisms of moral disengagement in the association between harsh parenting and adolescent aggression. 389 junior high school students participated. Data were collected by parents reporting on spouses' harsh parenting, adolescents themselves reporting on moral disengagement and nominating out aggressive classmates. The results indicated that harsh parenting was positively associated with each mechanism of moral disengagement and only the mechanisms of moral justification and euphemistic language completely mediated the association between harsh parenting and adolescent aggression. These results add to extant literature on how harsh parenting could risk adolescents for aggressive behaviors.


Introduction


Although research has indicated that harsh parenting could risk children for aggressive behaviors (Chen & Raine, 2018; Wang, 2017), the mediating mechanisms involved in this relationship remain to be further explored. Taking into account the impact of moral disengagement on child aggression (Gini, 2006; Shulman, Cauffman, Piquero, & Fagan, 2011), one might expect that moral disengagement might mediate the relation of harsh parenting to child aggression if harsh parenting functions as a risk factor for child moral disengagement. This study intends to explore the different mediating roles of the eight types of moral disengagement mechanisms in the association between harsh parenting and adolescent aggression. Following Bandura's (1999) social cognitive theory of moral agency, individuals would desist from injurious conduct under the guidance of internalized moral standards. Committing detrimental conduct would risk both external sanctions such as being disapproved and internal selfcondemnation such as shame and guilt. To refrain from internal selfsanctions, individuals seek to rationalize their detrimental behaviors that violate moral standards through various psychosocial processes that have been conceptualized as moral disengagement (Bandura, Barbaranelli, Caprara, & Pastorelli, 1996). Bandura et al. (1996) have proposed eight mechanisms of moral disengagement which could be classified as the following four groups. First, cognitive reconstruing enables individuals to reinterpret the reprehensible behaviors in a positive tone, including the following three mechanisms: moral justification by portraying the immoral conduct as warranted, advantageous comparison by contrasting a detrimental conduct with a worse one to make it seem less serious, euphemistic labeling by using convoluted or periphrastic language to mask condemnable conduct. The second group promotes people to distort the agentive relation between their harmful conduct and the behavioral consequences, mainly comprising displacement and diffusion of responsibility (i.e., regarding one's own immoral conduct as being caused by external sources such as social pressures rather than as being personally responsible). The third group consists of the following mechanisms: distorting by minimizing or even disregarding the consequences of one's reprehensible conduct. The fourth group capacitates self-censure to be avoided by dehumanization (i.e., stripping people of human qualities) or by attribution of blame (i.e., viewing themselves as being compelled into destructive conduct by victims who deserve being punished).

  • اشتراک گذاری در

دیدگاه خود را بنویسید:

تاکنون دیدگاهی برای این نوشته ارسال نشده است

مکانیزم های مختلف بی تفاوتی اخلاقی در ارتباط بین والدین خشن و پرخاشگری نوجوانان
نوشته های مرتبط
مقالات جدید
نماد اعتماد الکترونیکی
پیوندها