کل گرایی و تعهد طرفدار محیط زیست
ترجمه نشده

کل گرایی و تعهد طرفدار محیط زیست

عنوان فارسی مقاله: کل گرایی و تعهد طرفدار محیط زیست: بررسی نقش میانجی عوامل تعیین کننده عاطفی و شناختی
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله: Holism and pro-environmental commitment: An examination on the mediating roles of affective and cognitive determinants
مجله/کنفرانس: شخصیت و تفاوت های فردی – Personality and Individual Differences
رشته های تحصیلی مرتبط: روانشناسی، مهندسی محیط زیست
گرایش های تحصیلی مرتبط: روانشناسی عمومی، روانشناسی شناخت
کلمات کلیدی فارسی: تفکر کل گرا، تفکر تحلیلی، تعهد طرفدار محیط زیست، وابستگی عاطفی، آگاهی از خطر، طبیعت
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی: Holistic thinking، Analytic thinking، Pro-environmental commitment، Affective affinity، Awareness of risk، Nature
نوع نگارش مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی (Research Article)
نمایه: Scopus – Master Journals List – JCR
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.05.055
دانشگاه: School of Social Sciences, Nanyang Technical University, Singapore
ناشر: الزویر - Elsevier
نوع ارائه مقاله: ژورنال
نوع مقاله: ISI
سال انتشار مقاله: 2019
ایمپکت فاکتور: 2.383 در سال 2018
شاخص H_index: 141 در سال 2019
شاخص SJR: 1.245 در سال 2018
شناسه ISSN: 0191-8869
شاخص Quartile (چارک): Q1 در سال 2018
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی: PDF
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی: 7
وضعیت ترجمه: ترجمه نشده است
قیمت مقاله انگلیسی: رایگان
آیا این مقاله بیس است: بله
آیا این مقاله مدل مفهومی دارد: ندارد
آیا این مقاله پرسشنامه دارد: ندارد
آیا این مقاله متغیر دارد: دارد
کد محصول: E13699
رفرنس: دارای رفرنس در داخل متن و انتهای مقاله
فهرست انگلیسی مطالب

Abstract


1. Introduction


2. Study 1


3. Study 2


4. Study 3


5. General discussion


References

نمونه متن انگلیسی مقاله

Abstract


To advance the understanding of great individual variations in pro-environmental tendencies, the current research examined the role of holistic versus analytic thinking, which is non-specific to environmental issues, and explored the underlying mechanisms via both affective and cognitive determinants, i.e., affective affinity toward nature and awareness of risk to nature, respectively. Study 1 found that stronger holistic (vs. analytic) thinking predicted greater pro-environmental commitment, and this relation was explained by greater affective affinity toward nature and greater awareness of risk to nature. Recruiting a larger community sample with diverse demographic characteristics, Study 2 replicated the patterns of Study 1. Study 3 manipulated thinking style and found some partial evidence for the relationships among the examined variables. This research highlights the importance of domain-general individual characteristics in environmental research.


Introduction


Great individual variations in pro-environmental tendencies have been observed (Müller, Kals, & Pansa, 2009). A lot of attempts have been made to better understand these individual variations. Pro-environmental norms, values, beliefs, and attitudes have been found to significantly predict individual difference in pro-environmental behavior (e.g., Dunlap, van Liere, Mertig, & Jones, 2000; Eom, Kim, Sherman, & Ishii, 2016; Fransson & Gärling, 1999; Gosling & Williams, 2010; Schultz, 2001; Schultz, Nolan, Cialdini, Goldstein, & Griskevicius, 2007; Schultz, Shriver, Tabanico, & Khazian, 2004; Tam, 2013). While the influence of psychological factors that are domain-specific to environmental issues continues to receive great attention in environmental research, research interests on the influence of domaingeneral psychological factors are surging recently. In addition to demographic factors, such as gender, age, and educational experience (for a review, Gifford & Nilsson, 2014), self-construal (Chuang, Xie, & Liu, 2016), dialectical beliefs (Li, Mei, Li, & Lee, 2018), the big five personality traits (Milfont & Sibley, 2012), and cosmopolitan orientation (Leung, Koh, & Tam, 2015) are found to be able to explain individual difference in pro-environmental tendencies. Importantly, these domaingeneral psychological factors can bring significant incremental predictive power on pro-environmental behavior while the effect of environmental-specific variables such as pro-environmental worldviews and motivation is considered (Leung et al., 2015). This finding provides empirical support for significant and independent influences of domaingeneral psychological factors in environmental research. To extend this new research direction further, the current research examined the influence of holistic versus analytic thinking style, a domain-general psychological factor, on pro-environmental commitment. In addition, to advance the understanding of how domain-general psychological factors affect pro-environmental tendencies, the current research further explored the underlying mechanisms of the influence of holistic versus analytic thinking style.

  • اشتراک گذاری در

دیدگاه خود را بنویسید:

تاکنون دیدگاهی برای این نوشته ارسال نشده است

کل گرایی و تعهد طرفدار محیط زیست
نوشته های مرتبط
مقالات جدید
لوگوی رسانه های برخط

logo-samandehi

پیوندها