تفاوت های فرهنگی در تنظیم هیجان
ترجمه نشده

تفاوت های فرهنگی در تنظیم هیجان

عنوان فارسی مقاله: تفاوت های فرهنگی در نگرش های ضمنی و صریح به سمت تنظیم هیجان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله: Cultural differences in the implicit and explicit attitudes toward emotion regulation
مجله/کنفرانس: شخصیت و تفاوت های فردی – Personality and Individual Differences
رشته های تحصیلی مرتبط: روانشناسی
گرایش های تحصیلی مرتبط: روانشناسی عمومی
کلمات کلیدی فارسی: تنظیم هیجان، نگرش ضمنی، نگرش صریح، تقابل فرهنگی
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی: Emotion regulation، Implicit attitude، Explicit attitude، Cross-culture
نوع نگارش مقاله: مقاله کوتاه (Short Communication)
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.05.057
دانشگاه: College of Psychology and Sociology, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, PR China
صفحات مقاله انگلیسی: 3
ناشر: الزویر - Elsevier
نوع ارائه مقاله: ژورنال
نوع مقاله: ISI
سال انتشار مقاله: 2019
ایمپکت فاکتور: 2.383 در سال 2018
شاخص H_index: 141 در سال 2019
شاخص SJR: 1.245 در سال 2018
شناسه ISSN: 0191-8869
شاخص Quartile (چارک): Q1 در سال 2018
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی: PDF
وضعیت ترجمه: ترجمه نشده است
قیمت مقاله انگلیسی: رایگان
آیا این مقاله بیس است: خیر
آیا این مقاله مدل مفهومی دارد: ندارد
آیا این مقاله پرسشنامه دارد: ندارد
آیا این مقاله متغیر دارد: ندارد
کد محصول: E13717
رفرنس: دارای رفرنس در داخل متن و انتهای مقاله
فهرست مطالب (انگلیسی)

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Method

3. Results

4. Discussion

Funding

Declaration of Competing Interest

Appendix A. Supplementary data

References

بخشی از مقاله (انگلیسی)

Abstract

Culture has a strong influence on how people evaluate and regulate their emotions. Previous findings suggest that Easterners tend to prefer controlling their emotions more than do Westerners. However, there is still little evidence on the prevalence of cultural differences in implicit attitudes towards emotion regulation. The goal of the present study is to investigate cross-cultural differences in the implicit and explicit attitudes towards emotion regulation to help bridge this gap in the literature. The sample consisted of 61 Chinese and 54 European Americans. Emotion Regulation Implicit Association Test (ER-IAT) was used to examine the implicit attitudes towards emotion regulation. Results showed that (1) Chinese implicitly evaluated emotional expression as more negative than European Americans; (2) Similarly, Chinese explicitly valued emotional expression as less important than European Americans. Further implications are discussed.

Introduction

Emotion is the key to understanding human behavior and cognition. Previous research has found that people from different cultures prefer different regulatory strategies and have different habits with respect to emotion regulation (Butler, Lee, & Gross, 2009). In fact, some evidence suggests that culture shapes not only our emotions but also the way they are experienced and expressed (An, Ji, Marks, & Zhang, 2017). One possible explanation is that an underlying mechanism for the development of emotion regulation attitudes could be people’s socio-cultural contexts (Miyamoto & Ma, 2011). Thus, in the current study we aimed to explore cultural differences in attitudes towards emotion regulation. Attitudes towards emotion regulation have been studied as regulatory strategies people use to deal with emotional experiences. Attitudes towards emotion regulation influence people’s tendencies and their choice of emotion regulation strategies (Mauss, Evers, Wilhelm, & Gross, 2006). Besides the primarily investigated explicit attitudes, the attitudes towards emotion regulation can also be implicit. These implicit beliefs and attitudes occur without conscious awareness (Gross, 2013). Culture functions by identifying social norms, normative behaviors, and value systems that are relevant to emotions (An et al., 2017). Attitudes towards emotion regulation have been suggested to derive from individuals’ implicit social norms and regulatory goals, which may vary according to socio-cultural contexts (Miyamoto & Ma, 2011). According to the Cultural Model of Emotions (Matsumoto & Wilson, 2008), culture creates a belief and value system that calibrates emotional responses and behaviors to prevent social chaos and to maintain social order.