نوع شخصیت و رابطه آن با کاندید شدن برای انتخاب و اشتغال
ترجمه نشده

نوع شخصیت و رابطه آن با کاندید شدن برای انتخاب و اشتغال

عنوان فارسی مقاله: شخصیت و مشاغل سیاسی: چه نوع شخصیتی ممکن است برای انتخاب شدن و اشتغال کاندید شود؟
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله: Personality and political careers: What personality types are likely to run for office and get elected?
مجله/کنفرانس: شخصیت و تفاوت های فردی - Personality And Individual Differences
رشته های تحصیلی مرتبط: روانشناسی
گرایش های تحصیلی مرتبط: روانشناسی عمومی، روانشناسی شناخت، روانشناسی صنعتی و سازمانی
کلمات کلیدی فارسی: شخصیت، TIPI، انتخابات، شهروندان، کاندیداها
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی: Personality، TIPI، Elections، Citizens، Candidates
نوع نگارش مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی (Research Article)
نمایه: Scopus - Master Journals List - JCR
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.109600
دانشگاه: McGill University Centre for the Study of Democratic Citizenship, Canada
صفحات مقاله انگلیسی: 9
ناشر: الزویر - Elsevier
نوع ارائه مقاله: ژورنال
نوع مقاله: ISI
سال انتشار مقاله: 2020
ایمپکت فاکتور: 2/383 در سال 2019
شاخص H_index: 141 در سال 2020
شاخص SJR: 1/245 در سال 2019
شناسه ISSN: 0191-8869
شاخص Quartile (چارک): Q1 در سال 2019
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی: PDF
وضعیت ترجمه: ترجمه نشده است
قیمت مقاله انگلیسی: رایگان
آیا این مقاله بیس است: خیر
آیا این مقاله مدل مفهومی دارد: ندارد
آیا این مقاله پرسشنامه دارد: ندارد
آیا این مقاله متغیر دارد: ندارد
کد محصول: E13946
رفرنس: دارای رفرنس در داخل متن و انتهای مقاله
فهرست مطالب (انگلیسی)

Abstract

1- Introduction

2- Method

3- Results

4- Discussion

5- Conclusions

References

بخشی از مقاله (انگلیسی)

Abstract

This study investigates the relationship between personality and political careers. Drawing on a unique survey of municipal candidates from two Canadian provinces (N = 1193) and supplemented with survey data from citizens (N = 1665), we test for personality differences in candidate recruitment and electoral success. Results reveal significant personality differences between candidates and citizens, as well as between winning and losing candidates. Compared to other citizens, candidates are higher in extraversion, openness to experience, and emotional stability. As for the difference between electoral winners and losers, openness to experience is associated with a slightly higher likelihood of losing an election. These differences in personality traits emerge independent of other background characteristics such as age, education, and gender. Ultimately, the psychological dispositions that influence running for office and winning an election are not the same.

Conclusions

We report results from large surveys of municipal election candidates and adult citizens in two Canadian provinces. In line with other studies on personality and political ambition, the findings show that personality traits are reliably associated with running for election, independent of other psychological and social background characteristics. Compared to citizens, local candidates self-reported higher levels of openness to experience, extraversion, and emotional stability. This study advances our understanding of the role of personality in elections by exploring the influence of personality on candidate recruitment and electoral success. We find that candidates receive a slight electoral penalty for their relatively higher open-mindedness. Thus, candidates' personalities could substantively influence the results, especially in close elections. Ultimately, our findings demonstrate that the psychological predispositions that help distinguish candidates from other citizens are not necessarily the same as those that may help candidates get elected.