تحلیل توافقات ناآگاهانه در کره از طریق سیستم پذیریش اطلاعات مدیریتی
ترجمه نشده

تحلیل توافقات ناآگاهانه در کره از طریق سیستم پذیریش اطلاعات مدیریتی

عنوان فارسی مقاله: تحلیل توافقات ناآگاهانه در کره از طریق سیستم پذیریش اطلاعات مدیریتی
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله: Analysis of involuntary admissions in Korea through the admission management information system
مجله/کنفرانس: مجله بین المللی حقوق و روانپزشکی – International Journal of Law and Psychiatry
رشته های تحصیلی مرتبط: مدیریت، مهندسی فناوری اطلاعات
گرایش های تحصیلی مرتبط: سیستم های اطلاعاتی پیشرفته، مدیریت سیستم های اطلاعات
کلمات کلیدی فارسی: توافق ناآگاهانه، ارتقا سلامت روانی و عمل رفاهی، سیستم پذیرش اطلاعات مدیریتی، سیستم سلامت روانی
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی: Involuntary admission, Mental health promotion and welfare act, Admission management information system, Mental health system
نوع نگارش مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی (Research Article)
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2020.101542
دانشگاه: National Center for Mental Health, Seoul, Republic of Korea
صفحات مقاله انگلیسی: 6
ناشر: الزویر - Elsevier
نوع ارائه مقاله: ژورنال
نوع مقاله: ISI
سال انتشار مقاله: 2020
ایمپکت فاکتور: 1.210 در سال 2019
شاخص H_index: 58 در سال 2020
شاخص SJR: 0.445 در سال 2019
شناسه ISSN: 0160-2527
شاخص Quartile (چارک): Q3 در سال 2019
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی: PDF
وضعیت ترجمه: ترجمه نشده است
قیمت مقاله انگلیسی: رایگان
آیا این مقاله بیس است: خیر
آیا این مقاله مدل مفهومی دارد: ندارد
آیا این مقاله پرسشنامه دارد: ندارد
آیا این مقاله متغیر دارد: دارد
کد محصول: E14237
رفرنس: دارای رفرنس در داخل متن و انتهای مقاله
فهرست مطالب (انگلیسی)

Abstract

1- Introduction

2- Material and methods

3- Results

4- Discussion

5- Conclusions

Acknowledgements

References

بخشی از مقاله (انگلیسی)

Abstract

The Mental Health Promotion and Welfare Act, revised in 2016, tightened the involuntary admission regulations and processes, such as reporting involuntary admission within 3 days of admission, secondary diagnosis within 2 weeks, and admission suitability evaluation within 1 month, to improve the human rights of the mentally handicapped. The Admission Management Information System (AMIS) was also developed in 2017 to support these procedures and manage patients who were involuntarily admitted to the hospital.

We analyzed 34,685 cases of involuntary admission registered in the AMIS between July 2017 and June 2018. The general characteristics, diagnosis, admission hospital, admission type, age, and admission duration were examined, and diagnoses and the length of stay per hospital were analyzed.

Among the research subjects, 62.8% were male and 37.2% were female. A total of 70.8% had medical insurance and 28.5% had medical aid. A total of 67.8% of patients received secondary diagnosis by a psychiatrist who worked for a public or designated institution, 24.6% received secondary diagnosis by a psychiatrist who worked for the same institution as the primary psychiatrist, and 8.4% received primary diagnosis by a psychiatrist who admitted the patient. For diagnosis, F2 code was the most common at 38.1%, followed by F1 code at 29.1% and F3 code at 17.9%. For cases with only a primary diagnosis, F1 code diagnosis was the most common at 37.6%. For types of hospitalization, and admission by legal guardians was the most common at 93.2%, while administrative admission was at 6.7% and admission by legal guardians to a long-term care facility was at 0.1%. The average length of hospitalization duration was 74.4 days. A stay between 31 and 90 days was the most common (39.3%), and hospital stay of < 14 days was at 16.6%. The number of involuntary admissions for every 100,000 people was 67 cases on average, and this number was the highest in the South Gyeongsang Province, at 105.8 cases. Length of stay by diagnosis was the longest for F7 code (118 days), followed by F1code (91 days). Patients older than 60 years constituted 31.7% of the total sample, and those younger than 20 years showed the highest proportion in patients with diagnoses from F4 to F9 code.

Analyzing the involuntary admissions registered on the AMIS for 1 year revealed various information, such as the type of admission, sex, age, diagnosis, region, and admitted hospital. These results could be used to improve involuntary admission policies and mental health systems.

Introduction

Although many people with mental illness worldwide recognize the need for treatment and are voluntarily hospitalized, many others are still involuntarily hospitalized against their will (Jacobsen, 2012). Among the types of involuntary admissions defined by the Mental Health Act enacted in 1995 (Ministry of Health and Welfare, 1995), admission by legal guardians does not guarantee the rights to self-determination and procedural rights of people with mental illness. Admission by legal guardians is that requested by family members and is allowed with the diagnosis of one psychiatrist, but has been criticized as violating human rights. Therefore, the unconstitutionality of involuntary admission policy was publicly debated in the Constitutional Court, whereby the measures and procedures to prevent violation of personal autonomy and abuse of the people with mental illness were determined to be insufficient (Kim et al., 2018). The Constitutional Court ruled the constitutional inconsistency of the Mental Health Act in September 2016 (Constitutional Court of Korea, 2016).