دانلود مقاله ارزیابی خواص ملات سیمان و آجر
خلاصه
معرفی
روش آزمایشی مقیاس آزمایشگاهی
نتایج
آزمایشها و نتایج مقیاس صنعتی (مطالعه موردی)
بحث
نتیجه
در دسترس بودن داده ها و مواد
منابع
Abstract
Introduction
Lab-Scale Experimental Procedure
Results
Industrial Scale Experiments and Results (A Case Study)
Discussion
Conclusion
Availability of data and materials
References
Abstract
Recycling of abandoned waste bottom ash has been a key issue in Republic of Korea in terms of environmental protection as well as economic concern. In this work, a method for recycling of abandoned bottom ash has been discussed based on the results from laboratory and industrial-scale experiments. Abandoned bottom ash was magnetically separated and properties of magnetically separated bottom ash samples as well as properties of mortar and masonry cement brick made of bottom ash were investigated. According to the experimental results, bulk and skeletal densities were ranked in the order of strongly magnetic > weakly magnetic > as-received > non-magnetic (from heavier to lighter) bottom ash. From laboratory-scale experiments, compressive strengths of mortars made of bottom ash samples (measured by ASTM C 109) were lower than that of mortar made of standard sand. Among bottom ash samples, mortar made of non-magnetic bottom ash (after removal of unburnt carbon) showed higher compressive strength with lower thermal conductivity (measured by ASTM C 1113) and weight than others. Masonry cement brick made of magnetic bottom ash showed lower weight and thermal conductivity than those made of standard sand, while meeting the KS strength guideline as a masonry cement brick. The results suggest the applicability of bottom ash as lightweight aggregate for production of masonry cement brick. However, considering the lower strength obtained from masonry cement brick made of as-received bottom ash (without removal of unburnt carbon), unburnt carbon content should be removed prior to its utilization as lightweight aggregate.
Introduction
Consumption of fossil fuels for operation of coal fired power plant has been consistently increasing all over the world (International Energy Agency, 2009; Korre et al., 2010; Leblond, 2006; Shafiee & Topal, 2008). Although reduction in CO2 emission is very critical issue in this industry (Hussain et al., 2022), recycling of waste by-products is as important issue as the reduction of CO2 emission in terms of environmental protection (Abbas et al., 2020; Bui et al., 2019; Lee et al., 2020; Meek et al., 2021; Oakes et al., 2019) considering the amount of waste that has been generated so far. Approximately 730 million tons of bottom ash (Abbas et al., 2020) and 600 million tons of fly ash (Çiçek & Çinçin, 2015; Nyale et al., 2013) are annually produced in the world. Although fly ash has been successfully utilized as a supplementary cementitious material due to its beneficial properties such as reduction in the heat of hydration (Atiş, 2002a, 2002b; Langan et al., 2002; Matos et al., 2020; Nocuń-Wczelik, 2001; Schindler & Folliard, 2005), improvement in workability (Atiş, 2002b; Leung et al., 2016; Nocuń-Wczelik, 2001; Uysal et al., 2012; Yao et al., 2015), and long-term strength and durability (Pala et al., 2007; Siddique, 2003; Tikalsky et al., 1988), most of the bottom ash has not been recycled and abandoned in the waste storage site.
The utilization of bottom ash as a supplementary cementitious material has been limited. The chemical compositions of bottom ash are similar to that of fly ash. However, the particle size is larger and the structure is more crystalline than fly ash. For this reason, the pozzolanic activity of bottom ash is very weak. The work of (Cheriaf et al., 1999) showed that bottom ash did not react with calcium hydroxide at early ages. The pozzolanic activity was very slow until 28 days, and became accelerated after 90 days. Jurič et al. (Jurič et al., 2006) recommended to replace up to 15 wt% of cement by bottom ash to use it as a supplementary cementitious material. Kula et al. (Kula et al., 2002) showed that bottom ash can be used as a supplementary cementitious material depending on its particle size distribution. Jaturapitakkul et al. (Jaturapitakkul & Cheerarot, 2003) observed a glassy aluminosilicate phase (diffused halo maxima) at 20–27° 2θ (Cheriaf et al., 1999; Chindaprasirt et al., 2009) that can be a source of pozzolanic reaction, but reported that the pozzolanic activity of bottom ash can be increased by grinding the particle size lower than 45 μm. According to the literature, pozzolanic activity of bottom ash was so slow or weak that it cannot be effectively utilized as a supplementary cementitious material without additional mechanical or chemical treatment (Filipponi et al., 2003; Liu et al., 2018; Mangi et al., 2018).
Conclusion
In this work, magnetic separation was applied on bottom ash that was stored in the pond site of Hadong coal fired power plant. Properties of magnetically separated bottom ash were analyzed, mortar specimens as well as masonry cement brick samples were prepared, and compressive strength, water absorption, and thermal conductivity were measured. According to the results obtained from this work, following conclusions can be drawn.
1) Magnetic separation with 1000 and 3000 gauss magnet was effective for separating bottom ash samples that contains higher amount of magnetite. As a result, bulk and skeletal density of strongly magnetic bottom ash were higher than those of as-received bottom ash. Non-magnetic bottom ash showed the lowest bulk and skeletal density.
2) Pozzolanic activity of bottom ash was ranged 53 ~ 62% of fly ash that was stored at the same pond site. Considering the particle agglomeration observed from the fly ash, it is possible to evaluate the pozzolanic activity of bottom ash either as non-pozzolanic or as very weakly pozzolanic.
3) From laboratory scale experiments, non-magnetic bottom ash showed the better performance than strongly magnetic bottom ash in terms of compressive strength and thermal conductivity. Since large amount of unburnt carbon stayed together with non-magnetic bottom ash, removal of unburnt carbon is a key factor for successful utilization of non-magnetic bottom ash.
4) Masonry cement brick made of magnetic bottom ash showed 40% reduction in unit weight, 20% reduction in thermal conductivity. Utilization of non-magnetic bottom ash for masonry cement brick production after removal of unburnt carbon can also be a successful application, considering the results from laboratory-scale experiments (density and thermal conductivity was lower for non-magnetic bottom ash).