Abstract
Keywords
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusions
References
Introduction
It is widely accepted that moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) with short to moderate duration (<60 min) is associated with an enhanced immune defense [1].However, acute bouts of high-intense or high-volume aerobic exercise might provide transitory negative changes on immune cell count and function (lasting between 3 h to 72 h depending on the immune outcome) [2,3]. This might lead to immunosuppression and increased risk for infectious diseases [1,4,5]. The underlying mechanisms to exercise-induced immunosuppression, referred to as the “open window”, are multifactorial and involve neuroendocrine and metabolic factors such as catecholamines, cortisol and growth hormones [3,6]. Immunosuppression usually occurs after intensive training protocols that result in increased levels of inflammation, metabolic and oxidative stress [4]. Therefore, it is important to study different aerobic training protocols since different physiological demands could have different impacts on immune function. Interval training (IT) is an aerobic training strategy that usually consists in interspacing periods of high-intensity efforts with periods of rest or low-intensity exercise [7,8]. The rationality behind this strategy is to allow the accumulation of higher volume of vigorous exercise than those that could be achieved performing continuous exercise at high intensity [9]. Although current studies about the topic involve low-volume protocols [10–13], IT is usually performed near or at maximum individual’s capacity, which might result in higher metabolic and hormonal stress in comparison with MICT [14].During the past century, IT gained popularity in sports preparation [15]. This training strategy was widely adopted by coaches and athletes to train at workloads closer to their specific performance competition [15].