مکانیزم های روانشناختی پیوند دهنده محیط زیست اخلاقی
ترجمه نشده

مکانیزم های روانشناختی پیوند دهنده محیط زیست اخلاقی

عنوان فارسی مقاله: سازوكارهای روانشناختی پیوند دهنده محیط زیست اخلاقی تا مفهوم دمیدن در سوت كاركنان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله: Psychological mechanisms linking ethical climate to employee whistle-blowing intention
مجله/کنفرانس: مجله روانشناسی مدیریتی - Journal of Managerial Psychology
رشته های تحصیلی مرتبط: روانشناسی، مدیریت
گرایش های تحصیلی مرتبط: روانشناسی صنعتی و سازمانی، مدیریت منابع انسانی
کلمات کلیدی فارسی: جو اخلاقی درک شده، سوت زدن، شناسایی سازمانی، هویت اخلاقی، ریسک
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی: Perceived ethical climate، Whistle-blowing، Organizational identification، Moral identity، Risk aversion
نوع نگارش مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی (Research Article)
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-09-2017-0292
دانشگاه: Southeast University - Nanjing - China
صفحات مقاله انگلیسی: 19
ناشر: امرالد - Emeraldinsight
نوع ارائه مقاله: ژورنال
نوع مقاله: ISI
سال انتشار مقاله: 2018
ایمپکت فاکتور: 1/682 در سال 2017
شاخص H_index: 63 در سال 2019
شاخص SJR: 0/941 در سال 2017
شناسه ISSN: 0268-3946
شاخص Quartile (چارک): Q1 در سال 2017
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی: PDF
وضعیت ترجمه: ترجمه نشده است
قیمت مقاله انگلیسی: رایگان
آیا این مقاله بیس است: بله
کد محصول: E10755
فهرست مطالب (انگلیسی)

Abstract

Introduction

Theoretical background and hypothesis development

Research methodology

Results

Discussion

Limitations and future research directions

References

بخشی از مقاله (انگلیسی)

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to explore how a perceived ethical climate influences employees’ intention to whistle-blow through internal organizational channels and incorporates the mediating role of organizational identification and moral identity as well as the moderating role of individual risk aversion.

Introduction

Organizational wrongdoing impairs the rights and benefits of employees, the organization and the wider public. When employees are effectively motivated by an organization to find and report wrongdoings in the workplace, wrongdoings are attenuated and, over time, corrected. Whistle-blowing is the disclosure by current or former organizational members of wrongdoings (illegal, immoral or illegitimate practices) (Near and Miceli, 1985), which is an organizational autonomous characteristic of proactive, prosocial and ethical behavior (Treviño et al., 2006). Because of the potential retaliation faced by whistle-blowers, many employees are unwilling to blow the whistle on peers’ wrongdoings (Miceli et al., 2009). As a result, organizations miss the opportunity to self-correct their wrongdoing and employees may notify outsiders, which could potentially lead to destroying the organizations’ reputation, incurring legal costs, etc. (Miceli et al., 2009). Therefore, whistle-blowing is a significant topic in organizational ethics management, one that concerns why employees are willing to whistle-blow and how to induce that behavior. Academic progress has been made in the literature, where scholars have found that particular personal features influence whistle-blowing decision making, e.g., “Big Five” personality, self-efficacy, proactive personality, situation-specific leverage and different demographic characteristics (MacNab and Worthley, 2008; Rehg et al., 2008; Bjørkelo et al., 2010; Miceli et al., 2012; Liu et al., 2016). Organizational factors, such as ethical leadership, transformational leadership, co-worker validation, ethical culture, communication culture, team norms and organizational support, have been shown to play important roles in the personal decision to be a whistle-blower (Keenan, 2002; Tavakoli et al., 2003; Edwards et al., 2009; Skivenes and Trygstad, 2010; Kaptein, 2011; Caillier, 2013; Latan et al., 2016).