تأثیرات ساختاری بر هماهنگی و عملکرد در سیستم های multiteam
ترجمه نشده

تأثیرات ساختاری بر هماهنگی و عملکرد در سیستم های multiteam

عنوان فارسی مقاله: تأثیرات ساختاری بر هماهنگی و عملکرد در سیستم های multiteam
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله: Structural influences upon coordination and performance in multiteam systems
مجله/کنفرانس: مرور مدیریت منابع انسانی - Human Resource Management Review
رشته های تحصیلی مرتبط: مدیریت
گرایش های تحصیلی مرتبط: مدیریت منابع انسانی، مدیریت اجرایی
کلمات کلیدی فارسی: هماهنگی سیستم های Multiteam، عملکرد سیستم های Multiteam، وابستگی فرایند کارکردی، مکانیزم های ادغام، اثرات هم سنگ/ همگرا
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی: Multiteam systems coordination، Multiteam systems performance، Functional process interdependence، Integration mechanisms، Confluent/countervailing effects
نوع نگارش مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی (Research Article)
نمایه: Scopus - Master Journal List - JCR
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.02.001
دانشگاه: University of Western Australia, Business School, Australia
ناشر: الزویر - Elsevier
نوع ارائه مقاله: ژورنال
نوع مقاله: ISI
سال انتشار مقاله: 2018
ایمپکت فاکتور: 3/712 در سال 2017
شاخص H_index: 72 در سال 2019
شاخص SJR: 1/675 در سال 2017
شناسه ISSN: 1053-4822
شاخص Quartile (چارک): Q1 در سال 2017
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی: PDF
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی: 15
وضعیت ترجمه: ترجمه نشده است
قیمت مقاله انگلیسی: رایگان
آیا این مقاله بیس است: خیر
کد محصول: E10858
فهرست انگلیسی مطالب

Abstract


1- Introduction


2- Theoretical background and propositions


3- Discussion


References

نمونه متن انگلیسی مقاله

Abstract


Building upon organizational design and boundary spanning and multilevel literatures, we propose a theoretical framework that extends previous work on the drivers of multiteam system (MTS) coordination and performance. Our proposal integrates aspects of functional process interdependence and different integration mechanisms used within MTSs to better elucidate how different coordination processes emerge. The framework exposes potential countervailing or confluent effects of coordination processes on performance and, thereby, reconciles seemingly incongruent findings regarding the effect of different approaches to coordination on MTSs performance. In addition, our framework helps managers consider the multilevel nature of MTS coordination processes in ways that assist them in selecting an approach to effectively address the coordination challenges inherent in these complex systems.


Introduction


The leading organ transplant organization in the world, the Spanish National Transplant Organization, transplanted 2552 kidneys, 285 lungs and 249 hearts in 2013. This complex, life-saving and hope-giving task is only possible because of an extremely well-coordinated system of highly specialized teams. From a team of psychologists and grief counselors who talk to a heart-broken family to authorize a donation, to an intensive care unit (ICU) team keeping the vital organs viable after brain death of the donor, to a surgery team that extracts the donated organs, to a transplant coordinating unit arranging teams to transport the organs and coordinating the recipient surgery and anesthesia teams to receive the organs and complete the transplant. These teams have goals of their own to achieve, yet as highly interdependent members of an integrated system of work, their ultimate success is defined by a common superordinate goal – the successfully transplant of an organ. Achieving this life-saving goal requires effective integration and coordination of activities both within and across team boundaries. Highly interdependent teams of specialists, each with their own goals, yet sharing a superordinate goal (or set of goals), is the quintessential description of a multiteam system (Mathieu, Marks, & Zaccaro, 2001). Multiteam systems (MTSs) are enacted to address complex and urgent problems across a broad range of economic sectors. Environmental disasters, security crises, agricultural crop developments, cleaner energy, more sustainable mobility, key military operations, scientific discoveries, medical operations, and space exploration are examples of productive activities managed by teams of interdependent teams. Consequently, understanding the drivers of MTS performance and learning to manage them effectively continues to be a matter of great interest to scholars and practitioners alike (de Vries, Hollenbeck, Davison, Walter, & van der Vegt, 2016).

  • اشتراک گذاری در

دیدگاه خود را بنویسید:

تاکنون دیدگاهی برای این نوشته ارسال نشده است

تأثیرات ساختاری بر هماهنگی و عملکرد در سیستم های multiteam
نوشته های مرتبط
مقالات جدید
پیوندها