فرضیه های ریسک مستقل و وابسته در پویایی مدیریت شبکه درون سازمانی
ترجمه نشده

فرضیه های ریسک مستقل و وابسته در پویایی مدیریت شبکه درون سازمانی

عنوان فارسی مقاله: پویایی مدیریت شبکه اضطراری درون سازمانی : فرضیه های ریسک مستقل و وابسته
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله: The Dynamics of an Interorganizational Emergency Management Network: Interdependent and Independent Risk Hypotheses
مجله/کنفرانس: بررسی مدیریت دولتی - Public Administration Review
رشته های تحصیلی مرتبط: مدیریت
گرایش های تحصیلی مرتبط: مدیریت استراتژیک، مدیریت عملکرد
نوع نگارش مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی (Research Article)
نمایه: JCR - Master Journal List - Scopus
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12993
دانشگاه: Sungkyunkwan University
ناشر: وایلی - Wiley
نوع ارائه مقاله: ژورنال
نوع مقاله: ISI
سال انتشار مقاله: 2018
ایمپکت فاکتور: 3/206 در سال 2017
شاخص H_index: 106 در سال 2019
شاخص SJR: 3/023 در سال 2017
شناسه ISSN: 1540-6210
شاخص Quartile (چارک): Q1 در سال 2017
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی: PDF
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی: 11
وضعیت ترجمه: ترجمه نشده است
قیمت مقاله انگلیسی: رایگان
آیا این مقاله بیس است: بله
کد محصول: E11071
فهرست انگلیسی مطالب

Abstract


Evidence for Practice


Institutional Collective Action Framework


Interdependent Risk Hypothesis


Independent Risk Hypothesis


Homophily Hypothesis


Background of the 2012 Typhoons in South Korea


Research Design and Methods


Model Specification


Results and Discussion


Stochastic Actor-Based Models


Conclusion


References

نمونه متن انگلیسی مقاله

Abstract


The purpose of this research is to uncover the dynamic structure of an interorganizational emergency management network after a disaster. This research tests two hypothesized network structures: interdependent risk and independent risk. While the former illustrates the importance of trust and information redundancy in coordinating and aligning emergency preparedness and response, the latter captures the tendency for local actors to seek dominant partners to bridge crucial information across the region. A stochastic actor-based model with a forward selection strategy is used to analyze the structural effects of endogenous networks and the effects of exogenous community attributes on interorganizational ties. Based on the data sets collected before and after the 2012 typhoons in South Korea, the results support the interdependent risk hypothesis, suggesting that an interorganizational network structure tends to evolve into the notion of shared collaboration risk.


Institutional Collective Action Framework


The institutional collective action (ICA) framework posits that the transaction costs of monitoring and enforcing the contracted obligations for collaboration can prevent organizations from working together to achieve better outcomes (Feiock and Scholz 2010). The relative advantage analysis of transaction costs (e.g., information costs, negotiation costs, agency costs, and enforcement costs) provides insights into the obstacles preventing the realization of collective decisions (Feiock 2007; Inman and Rubinfeld 1997). Dilemmas between organizational and societal needs also arise from a system of fragmented authority (i.e., vertical, horizontal, and functional fragmentation), which become barriers to mutually beneficial action because they generate transaction costs at points at which organizations are considering agreements for joint activities. The ICA perspective extends the collective action theory, which is concerned with individuals’ behaviors and identifies problems associated with suboptimal outcomes at the organizational level. Despite the existence of an optimal outcome for society, each organizational behavior that seeks to maximize individual benefits may lead to the second-best outcome for society. The framework has also been utilized to study organizational behaviors using contract and transaction cost theories (Feiock 2009; Feiock and Scholz 2010). In the context of EM, the ICA framework has been applied to study interorganizational collaboration as interactions or interorganizational ties (Andrew and Carr 2013; Andrew et al. 2016; Andrew, Jung, and Li 2015). Such interactions can improve the level of emergency response, as they offer informal mechanisms for actors to reduce the cost of coordination and cooperation (Andrew et al. 2016). A beneficial exchange is realized when actors receive crucial resources from multiple actors.

  • اشتراک گذاری در

دیدگاه خود را بنویسید:

تاکنون دیدگاهی برای این نوشته ارسال نشده است

فرضیه های ریسک مستقل و وابسته در پویایی مدیریت شبکه درون سازمانی
نوشته های مرتبط
مقالات جدید
نماد اعتماد الکترونیکی
پیوندها