شواهدی از یک شرکت چند ملیتی telco
ترجمه نشده

شواهدی از یک شرکت چند ملیتی telco

عنوان فارسی مقاله: حل معضل بین کنترل و استقلال تیم در دوران بعد از بوروکراتیک: شواهدی از یک شرکت چند ملیتی telco
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله: Resolving the dilemma between team autonomy and control in a post-bureaucratic era: Evidences from a telco multinational company
مجله/کنفرانس: پویایی شناسی سازمانی - Organizational Dynamics
رشته های تحصیلی مرتبط: مدیریت
گرایش های تحصیلی مرتبط: مدیریت منابع انسانی، مدیریت عملکرد، تحقیق در عملیات
نوع نگارش مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی (Research Article)
نمایه: Scopus - Master Journal List - JCR
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2018.03.002
ناشر: الزویر - Elsevier
نوع ارائه مقاله: ژورنال
نوع مقاله: ISI
سال انتشار مقاله: 2018
ایمپکت فاکتور: 1/552 در سال 2018
شاخص H_index: 55 در سال 2019
شاخص SJR: 0/634 در سال 2018
شناسه ISSN: 0090-2616
شاخص Quartile (چارک): Q1 در سال 2018
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی: PDF
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی: 9
وضعیت ترجمه: ترجمه نشده است
قیمت مقاله انگلیسی: رایگان
آیا این مقاله بیس است: خیر
کد محصول: E11238
فهرست انگلیسی مطالب

Introduction: controls in a post-bureaucratic era


Analyzing controls


Formal control mechanisms and their enactment


Additional controls: the relevance of social mechanisms


How do self-managing, team-based organizations evolve through controls?


Discussion


Key takeaways


Conclusion


Selected bibliography

نمونه متن انگلیسی مقاله

Introduction: controls in a post-bureaucratic era


Innovative firms in global markets have grown aware of the importance to keep the ideas alive and to renew their learning and innovation capabilities, while focusing on reaching high quality and low cost and responding to customers’ needs. To achieve these objectives a growing number of firms have embraced the conversion to the so-called “post-bureaucratic” organizational structures, transforming from hierarchically-based to flat organizations built around self-managed teams. So, they moved from a coercive form of organization - abrogating individual autonomy and focusing on the typical technical efficiency of bureaucracy - to a context where individuals are provided with broader information and pushed to interact creatively, master their tasks, and assess their performance against their historical standards (conceived as valuable resources for both performance optimization and identification of opportunities locally and systemically). Indeed, bureaucratic organizational forms, based on fixed boundaries and hierarchical, top-down, control and authority were not fit to face the volatility of market and the high level of environmental dynamism and uncertainty. Therefore, a “horizontal shift” has occurred, reducing the level of vertical differentiation of hierarchical forms. In order to improve the organization readiness to change, cross-functional processes were implemented, delayering, giving empowerment and delegating the decision power closer to knowledge and information. Self-managing teams, working cross-functionally, represent the basis of post-bureaucratic organizational structures, promoting authority decentralization and employee empowerment. Network relations and crosscutting links between members supposedly create favorable conditions for organizational learning, fostering innovation and flexibility. We define innovation as the adoption of any process, product or service previously foreign to the focal organization. Indeed, past research has stressed the relevance of individual, organizational, and environmentalfactors as correlates ofinnovation, while others have viewed innovation as a function of all three factors. Nonetheless, experience proves that it is more difficult than expected to uncover ideas or to make use of internal capabilities for learning and innovation purposes. Despite the wide adoption of the team-based organizational structure, there are still challenges to address to be able to lead teams towards the achievement of a good balance between learning, innovation and performance goals. For example, understanding the proper role for team executives and leaders, and the effect of organizational controls in shaping team behaviors and values. These challenges still do not find appropriate responses due the difficulty to match proper managerial interventions with specific internal team characteristics and configuration. Internal and external contextual factors can have multiple and unexpected conflicting influences on team learning capability and performance. This is the case of the focal multinational corporation in the telco industry that we analyzed. This article focuses on organizational controls acting atthe individual,team and organizational level, unexpectedly causing the decline of learning and innovation performance. We describe their combination and their effects on the achievement of organizational learning and innovation goals (Fig. 1).

  • اشتراک گذاری در

دیدگاه خود را بنویسید:

تاکنون دیدگاهی برای این نوشته ارسال نشده است

شواهدی از یک شرکت چند ملیتی telco
نوشته های مرتبط
مقالات جدید
لوگوی رسانه های برخط

logo-samandehi

پیوندها