نرخ بازده و فاکتورهای ریسک شرکت‌های بین‌المللی نفت
ترجمه نشده

نرخ بازده و فاکتورهای ریسک شرکت‌های بین‌المللی نفت

عنوان فارسی مقاله: نرخ بازده و فاکتورهای ریسک شرکت‌های بین‌المللی نفت در قراردادهای خدمات بازپرداخت ایران
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله: On the rate of return and risk factors to international oil companies in Iran's buy-back service contracts
مجله/کنفرانس: Energy Policy
رشته های تحصیلی مرتبط: اقتصاد، مهندسی نفت، مدیریت
گرایش های تحصیلی مرتبط:  اقتصاد مالی، اقتصاد نفت و گاز، مدیریت ریسک
کلمات کلیدی فارسی: نرخ بازده، فاکتورهای ریسک، قرارداد خدمات بازپرداخت ایران
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی: Rate of return, Risk factors, Iran's buy-back service contract
نوع نگارش مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی (Research Article)
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.01.003
دانشگاه: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, United States
صفحات مقاله انگلیسی: 14
ناشر: الزویر - Elsevier
نوع ارائه مقاله: ژورنال
نوع مقاله: ISI
سال انتشار مقاله: 2017
ایمپکت فاکتور: 4.269 در سال 2017
شاخص H_index: 159 در سال 2019
شاخص SJR: 1.994 در سال 2017
شناسه ISSN: 0301-4215
شاخص Quartile (چارک): Q1 در سال 2017
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی: PDF
وضعیت ترجمه: ترجمه نشده است
قیمت مقاله انگلیسی: رایگان
آیا این مقاله بیس است: بله
کد محصول: E11789
فهرست مطالب (انگلیسی)

Highlights

Abstract

1- Introduction

2- Model and results

3- Conclusion and policy implications

Appendix A. Parameters and data

Appendix B. Time profile for capital expenditures

Appendix C. Operating and maintenance cost

Appendix D. Oil price, production, and LIBOR

References

بخشی از مقاله (انگلیسی)

Abstract

We analyze the rate of return (ROR) and risk factors faced by Shell Exploration, an international oil company (IOC), in its Soroosh and Nowrooz buy-back service contract in Iran. In particular, based on our models of cash flow, we analyze the buy-back contract specific risk factors that can contribute to a reduction in the rate of return for the international oil company. Our cash flow models resemble the cash flow of buy-back service contracts before the Iranian government changed the way it determined the capital cost ceiling and pre-defined the oil price in these contracts in 2008–2009. Our actual and contractual cash flow models reveal that Shell Exploration's actual ROR was much lower than the contractual level. Furthermore, we find that among the risk factors that we considered, a capital cost overrun has the greatest negative effect on the IOC's ROR. Moreover, we show that there is a potential for modifying the contracts in order for the IOC to face an actual ROR closer to the contractual ROR even if the contract faces cost overrun or delay, without exceeding the maximum contractual ROR that the National Iranian Oil Company is willing to give.

Introduction

In recent years, some oil and natural gas producing countries have shown an increasing interest in adopting variations of service-type contracts rather than production sharing contracts or concessions in their oil and natural gas development and exploration projects (Ghandi and Lin, 2014).1 A service contract2 is a long-term contractual framework that governs the relation between a host government and international oil companies (IOCs) in which the IOCs develop or explore oil or natural gas fields on behalf of the host government in return for pre-determined fees and in which in most cases the host government does not hand over the control of the extracted or subsoil or sub-surface resources to the IOCs (Ghandi and Lin, 2014).3 One type of service contract is Iran's buy-back service contract.