سرقت کارمند خرده فروشی
ترجمه نشده

سرقت کارمند خرده فروشی

عنوان فارسی مقاله: سرقت کارمند خرده فروشی: یک مطالعه از ترک کردن اخلاقی
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله: Retail employee pilferage: A study of moral disengagement
مجله/کنفرانس: مجله تحقیقات کسب و کار-Journal of Business Research
رشته های تحصیلی مرتبط: مدیریت
گرایش های تحصیلی مرتبط: مدیریت کسب و کار
کلمات کلیدی فارسی: خرده فروشی، سرقت کارمند خرده فروشی، رهبری اخلاقی، ترک کردن اخلاقی، شخصیت اخلاقی
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی: Retailing، Retail employee pilferage، Ethical leadership، Moral disengagement، Moral identity
نوع نگارش مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی (Research Article)
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.02.008
دانشگاه: Birmingham Business School, United Kingdom
صفحات مقاله انگلیسی: 12
ناشر: الزویر - Elsevier
نوع ارائه مقاله: ژورنال
نوع مقاله: ISI
سال انتشار مقاله: 2019
ایمپکت فاکتور: 5.352 در سال 2018
شاخص H_index: 158 در سال 2019
شاخص SJR: 2.203 در سال 2018
شناسه ISSN: 0148-2963
شاخص Quartile (چارک): Q1 در سال 2018
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی: PDF
وضعیت ترجمه: ترجمه نشده است
قیمت مقاله انگلیسی: رایگان
آیا این مقاله بیس است: بله
آیا این مقاله مدل مفهومی دارد: دارد
آیا این مقاله پرسشنامه دارد: ندارد
آیا این مقاله متغیر دارد: دارد
کد محصول: E12244
رفرنس: دارای رفرنس در داخل متن و انتهای مقاله
فهرست مطالب (انگلیسی)

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Conceptual framework

3. Method

4. Data analyses and hypotheses testing

5. Discussion

Compliance with ethical standards

Appendix A. Supplementary data

References

بخشی از مقاله (انگلیسی)

Abstract

Employee pilferage – the unauthorized taking of work property or the means of production on a relatively small scale – is extremely costly. However, very little is known about what psychologically drives frontline retail workers to pilfer. Drawing upon the social cognitive theory of self-regulation, we argue that moral disengagement is the key psychological mechanism that frees retail employees to pilfer in the workplace without experiencing feelings of guilt or self-censure. We further develop and test a conceptual framework that depicts the causes of pilferage moral disengagement by customer-contact retail employees. We find that both moral identity centrality and ethical leadership inhibit pilferage moral disengagement, while cynicism and pilferage norms enhance it. Moreover, moral identity centrality can also alleviate the positive effects of both cynicism and pilferage norms on pilferage moral disengagement. We discuss the theoretical implications of these findings and the implications for practice.

Introduction

Studies of ancient Egypt have found that tomb-makers literally risked their necks pilfering from their employers. Closer to home, just a few generations ago, pilfering a loaf of bread from an employer could find the perpetrator forcibly deported thousands of miles to a foreign continent. Today, contemporary studies suggest that employee pilferage costs retailers billions of dollars every day. As such, pilferage is a persistent and pervasive phenomenon. Employee pilferage is a salient issue, particularly in the retail sector. In the retail sector alone, the costs were recently estimated as $32 billion per year. A recent report showed that employee theft has been identified as the single biggest cause of loss to retailers in the US, more than customer theft (Retail Knowledge, 2015). A similar picture can be obtained in the UK, as it has been found that each employee theft costs four times that of customer theft (British Retail Consortium, 2015). Pilferage, particularly time theft, can potentially have a significant negative impact on the quality of customer service and the customer experience in the retailing environment.