احساسات، استرس و مدیریت تعارض
ترجمه نشده

احساسات، استرس و مدیریت تعارض

عنوان فارسی مقاله: فصل ۲۳ - دیدگاه های طول عمر در مورد احساسات، استرس و مدیریت تعارض
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله: Chapter 23 - Lifespan Perspectives on Emotion, Stress, and Conflict Management
مجله/کنفرانس: کار در سراسر طول زندگی - Work Across the Lifespan
رشته های تحصیلی مرتبط: مدیریت
گرایش های تحصیلی مرتبط: مدیریت منایع انسانی، مدیریت استراتژیک، مدیریت استراتژیک منابع انسانی، مدیریت عملکرد
کلمات کلیدی فارسی: سن، كارگران بزرگتر، كار احساسی، تنظيم هيجان، مديريت تعارض، مديريت استرس، كار خدمات، شايستگي هاي اجتماعي، شايستگي هاي هيجاني
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی: Age، older workers، emotional labor، emotion regulation، conflict management، stress management، service work، social competencies، emotional competencies
نوع نگارش مقاله: مقاله فصلی (Chapter Item)
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-812756-8.00023-2
دانشگاه: Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, Frankfurt, Germany
صفحات مقاله انگلیسی: 28
ناشر: الزویر - Elsevier
نوع ارائه مقاله: ژورنال
نوع مقاله: ISI
سال انتشار مقاله: 2019
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی: PDF
وضعیت ترجمه: ترجمه نشده است
قیمت مقاله انگلیسی: رایگان
آیا این مقاله بیس است: خیر
آیا این مقاله مدل مفهومی دارد: ندارد
آیا این مقاله پرسشنامه دارد: ندارد
آیا این مقاله متغیر دارد: ندارد
کد محصول: E12742
رفرنس: دارای رفرنس در داخل متن و انتهای مقاله
فهرست مطالب (انگلیسی)

Abstract

Age and Emotion Work

Age and Conflict Management

Age and Stress Management

Discussion

Conclusion

References

بخشی از مقاله (انگلیسی)

AGE AND STRESS MANAGEMENT

Although there is a general belief that as we age we increasingly struggle with health problems, empirical evidence shows that older workers often report lower strain than younger or middle-aged colleagues (Beehr, Grosch & Adams, 2019; see Chapter 15 of this volume). For example, older workers reported less emotional exhaustion in the meta-analyses of Brewer and Shapard (2004) and Ng and Feldman (2010). One explanation for this might be that older workers are better able to cope with stress. In their transactional model, Lazarus and Folkman (1984, p. 19) define psychological stress as “a particular relationship between the person and the environment that is appraised by the person as taxing or exceeding his or her resources and endangering his or her well-being.” Two processes play a crucial role in this model: appraisal processes and coping. Primary appraisal refers to categorizing situational aspects as irrelevant, benign-positive, or stressful. Stress appraisals comprise harm/loss, threat, and challenge. Secondary appraisal refers to what can be done in the face of a stressful encounter, i.e., the coping options available. On the basis of such primary and secondary appraisals, individuals start their coping processes that can lead to reappraisal processes. With regard to stress management, younger and older workers may first differ in how they appraise stressful situations (Scheibe & Zacher, 2013). Life experience and knowledge of a variety of stressful situations may influence the appraisal processes of older workers so that they tend to appraise situations as less stressful than do younger workers. Indeed, the metaanalysis of Ng and Feldman (2010) shows that age is negatively correlated with a variety of job stressors such as role conflict and role overload. In the present context, stressors referring to the social work environment are of particular interest. In Ng and Feldman’s meta-analysis, relationship conflicts were negatively related to age and interpersonal trust was positively related to age. In a similar vein, in Beitler et al.’s (2016) and Johnson et al.’s (2013) studies age was negatively related with social stressors occurring in service provider-customer interactions such as being exposed to disproportionate customer expectations or customer verbal aggression (see Dormann & Zapf, 2004; Dudenho¨ffer & Dormann, 2015).