ارزش گذاری غیر بازاری و اهمیت یادگیری اجتماعی در آن
ترجمه نشده

ارزش گذاری غیر بازاری و اهمیت یادگیری اجتماعی در آن

عنوان فارسی مقاله: اهمیت یادگیری اجتماعی برای ارزش گذاری غیر بازاری
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله: The importance of social learning for non-market valuation
مجله/کنفرانس: اقتصاد اکولوژیکی - Ecological Economics
رشته های تحصیلی مرتبط: اقتصاد، علوم اجتماعی
گرایش های تحصیلی مرتبط: اقتصاد مالی، توسعه اقتصادی و برنامه ریزی
کلمات کلیدی فارسی: رفاه اجتماعی، ارزش گذاری غیر بازاری، ارزیابی مشاوره ای، مؤسسات مشاوره ای، تجزیه و تحلیل سود هزینه، Arrow’s impossibility
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی: Social welfare، Non-market valuation، Deliberative valuation، Deliberative institutions، Cost benefit analysis، Arrow’s impossibility
نوع نگارش مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی (Research Article)
نمایه: Scopus - Master Journals List - JCR
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.05.019
دانشگاه: Division of Tropical Environments and Society, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4811, Australia
ناشر: الزویر - Elsevier
نوع ارائه مقاله: ژورنال
نوع مقاله: ISI
سال انتشار مقاله: 2019
ایمپکت فاکتور: 4/535 در سال 2018
شاخص H_index: 174 در سال 2019
شاخص SJR: 1/767 در سال 2018
شناسه ISSN: 0921-8009
شاخص Quartile (چارک): Q1 در سال 2018
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی: PDF
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی: 9
وضعیت ترجمه: ترجمه نشده است
قیمت مقاله انگلیسی: رایگان
آیا این مقاله بیس است: خیر
آیا این مقاله مدل مفهومی دارد: ندارد
آیا این مقاله پرسشنامه دارد: ندارد
آیا این مقاله متغیر دارد: ندارد
کد محصول: E12896
رفرنس: دارای رفرنس در داخل متن و انتهای مقاله
فهرست انگلیسی مطالب

Abstract


1- Introduction


2- Theoretical background


3- Empirical application


4- Discussion


5- Conclusion


References

نمونه متن انگلیسی مقاله

Abstract


Neoclassical valuation methods often measure the contribution that non-market goods make to utility as income compensations. This circumvents Arrow's impossibility (AI) –a theoretical proof establishing the impossibility of social preferences – but those methods cannot be used in all settings. We build on Arrow's original proof, showing that with two additional axioms that allow for social learning, a second round of preference elicitation with a social announcement after the first, generates logically consistent social preferences. In short: deliberation leads to convergence. A ‘web-game’ aligning with this is trialed to select real world projects, in a deliberative way, with the board of an Australian Aboriginal Corporation. Analysis of the data collected in the trial validates our theory; our test for convergence is statistically significant at the 1% level. Our results also suggest complex social goods are relatively undervalued without deliberation. Most non-market valuation methods could be easily adapted to facilitate social learning.


Introduction


The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment emphasized the importance of properly measuring the impact of social decisions on ecosystems given their importance to human wellbeing (Bullock et al., 2018). That this notion has been widely accepted is evidenced by the rapid growth in studies that seek to do that – often using neoclassical non-market valuation methods to generate estimates and with large organizations supporting the endeavor (see, for example, The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (Braat and De Groot, 2012)). Neoclassical methods have done much to highlight the importance of numerous non-market goods and services, including various ecosystem services, but cannot measure the value of all goods and services (Cook et al., 2017). They are adept at measuring the value (in terms of income compensation) of simple individual goods – herein denoted as SIG and defined as a good that generates a simple/singular benefit (e.g. more income or more food) which accrues to an individual, but struggle to adequately measure relational values (Chan et al., 2016), with some arguing that neoclassical methods are, by definition, incommensurable with them (Kallis et al., 2013; Oberheim and Hoyningen-Huene, 2009).1 Neoclassical methods are not yet adept at measuring the value of complex social goods (Stoeckl et al., 2018) – herein denoted CSG and defined as goods that generate a diverse range of benefits2 that accrue to a diverse range of people at multiple social scales (e.g. to individuals, families, communities and/or society more broadly). This is because neoclassical methods are essentially partial equilibrium in nature – specifically designed to assess the value of singular/simple goods that generate benefits for individuals, whilst assuming all else is constant (and that individual preferences/utility functions, are independent). The social valuation of ecosystem services (particularly those that are essentially CSGs), which allows one to deduce social preference, thus remains an open problem for contemporary ecological economics (Kenter et al., 2015; Kenter et al., 2016).

  • اشتراک گذاری در

دیدگاه خود را بنویسید:

تاکنون دیدگاهی برای این نوشته ارسال نشده است

ارزش گذاری غیر بازاری و اهمیت یادگیری اجتماعی در آن
نوشته های مرتبط
مقالات جدید
نماد اعتماد الکترونیکی
پیوندها