مصرف پایدار در تحرک
ترجمه نشده

مصرف پایدار در تحرک

عنوان فارسی مقاله: مصرف پایدار در تحرک از منظر ارزیابی چرخه زندگی
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله: Sustainable consumption in mobility from a life cycle assessment perspective
مجله/کنفرانس: مجله تولید پاک – Journal of Cleaner Production
رشته های تحصیلی مرتبط: مدیریت
گرایش های تحصیلی مرتبط: بازاریابی
کلمات کلیدی فارسی: ارزیابی چرخه زندگی مصرف کننده، انتقال، سبک زندگی، پایداری، تنوع حاشیه ای در ارزیابی اثرات
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی: Consumer LCA، transportation، lifestyle، sustainability، Marginal Variation on Impact Assessment
نوع نگارش مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی (Research Article)
نمایه: Scopus – Master Journals List – JCR
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.203
دانشگاه: Environmental Economy and Management Research Group, Santa Catarina State University, Lages, SC, Brazil
ناشر: الزویر - Elsevier
نوع ارائه مقاله: ژورنال
نوع مقاله: ISI
سال انتشار مقاله: 2019
ایمپکت فاکتور: 7.096 در سال 2018
شاخص H_index: 150 در سال 2019
شاخص SJR: 1.620 در سال 2018
شناسه ISSN: 0959-6526
شاخص Quartile (چارک): Q1 در سال 2018
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی: PDF
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی: 9
وضعیت ترجمه: ترجمه نشده است
قیمت مقاله انگلیسی: رایگان
آیا این مقاله بیس است: خیر
آیا این مقاله مدل مفهومی دارد: ندارد
آیا این مقاله پرسشنامه دارد: ندارد
آیا این مقاله متغیر دارد: دارد
کد محصول: E12997
رفرنس: دارای رفرنس در داخل متن و انتهای مقاله
فهرست انگلیسی مطالب

Abstract


1. Introduction


2. Materials and methods


3. Results


4. Discussion


5. Conclusions


Acknowledgements


Appendix A. Supplementary data


Research Data


References

نمونه متن انگلیسی مقاله

Abstract


The shift toward the adoption of sustainable lifestyles may be achieved with the support of environmental indicators, such as those obtained from Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). The aim of this paper was to perform a Consumer LCA of the potential environmental impacts of mobility habits of a generic consumer. This study also proposed a methodology for analyzing life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) results called Marginal Variation on Impact Assessment (MVIA). Mobility habits in lifestyles were modeled considering transportation to short and long-distance travels. The mobility alternatives considered were travel on foot, by bicycle, car (private and shared), bus, and airplane. Linear regression was applied to identify the marginal variation in aggregated single score results of transportation habits. Mobility with a private car had the highest environmental impact, whereas the use of a bus, bicycle and walking were the most sustainable alternatives. The results exhibited sensitivity to car-sharing. Taking flights for longdistance travels resulted in higher environmental impacts than other alternatives. Marginal Variation on Impact Assessment indicated that the consumer may find the greatest potential to change behavior and reduce impacts in mobility habits related to short-distance travels as well as by reducing the frequency of long-distance travels. The proposed MVIA methodology fits as a tool to support environmental life cycle impact assessment.


Introduction


The transport sector is a hotspot accounting for about 14% of greenhouse gas emissions (IPCC, 2014) and 24% of carbon dioxide emissions from fuel consumption (IEA, 2017). Nonetheless, there is still a growing demand for passenger commuting and alternatives of mobility, especially in developing countries (Dalkmann and Huizenga, 2010). In addition, there is a need for more sustainability in transportation, which is determined by factors like the availability of appropriate transportation infrastructure (Chiou et al., 2013), the promotion of sustainable consumer policies (Thøgersen, 2005), and a shift on transportation habits by consumers (Young et al., 2010). In turn, decision-makers are faced with the challenge of ensuring a larger capacity of transport systems, as well as to meet the consumer demands for more sustainable alternatives of mobility (United Nations Environment Programme, 2016). How lower would be individual environmental impacts by sharing a car when going to work? If doing so rather than taking a bus, would a consumer increase his or her own environmental footprint? In this sense, a consumer might wonder: what mobility alternatives would be more sustainable? The aim of this study is to perform a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to analyze the potential environmental impacts of mobility habits of a generic consumer. Therefore, we aim to provide real consumers with information supporting a more sustainable change in lifestyles, as well as to back-up decision-makers to evaluate more precisely what aspects should be prioritized when formulating policies for sustainable consumption.

  • اشتراک گذاری در

دیدگاه خود را بنویسید:

تاکنون دیدگاهی برای این نوشته ارسال نشده است

مصرف پایدار در تحرک
نوشته های مرتبط
مقالات جدید
لوگوی رسانه های برخط

logo-samandehi

پیوندها