ارزیابی و نتایج عملکرد خدمات مسافرین
ترجمه نشده

ارزیابی و نتایج عملکرد خدمات مسافرین

عنوان فارسی مقاله: شباهت ها و تفاوت ها در سنجش، ارزیابی و نتایج عملکرد خدمات مسافرین آسیایی و غربی
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله: Similarities and differences in Asian and Western travelers’ service performance measurement, evaluation and outcomes
مجله/کنفرانس: مجله خرده فروشی و خدمات مصرف کننده – Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services
رشته های تحصیلی مرتبط: مدیریت
گرایش های تحصیلی مرتبط: مدیریت کیفیت و بهره وری، بازاریابی
کلمات کلیدی فارسی: کیفیت خدمات، خدمات مشتری، هم ارزی چند فرهنگی، سفر بین المللی
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی: Service quality، Customer service، Cross-cultural equivalence، International travel
نوع نگارش مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی (Research Article)
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.07.010
دانشگاه: Business School, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
صفحات مقاله انگلیسی: 11
ناشر: الزویر - Elsevier
نوع ارائه مقاله: ژورنال
نوع مقاله: ISI
سال انتشار مقاله: 2019
ایمپکت فاکتور: 4.218 در سال 2018
شاخص H_index: 65 در سال 2019
شاخص SJR: 1.211 درسال 2018
شناسه ISSN: 0969-6989
شاخص Quartile (چارک): Q1 در سال 2018
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی: PDF
وضعیت ترجمه: ترجمه نشده است
قیمت مقاله انگلیسی: رایگان
آیا این مقاله بیس است: بله
آیا این مقاله مدل مفهومی دارد: دارد
آیا این مقاله پرسشنامه دارد: ندارد
آیا این مقاله متغیر دارد: دارد
کد محصول: E13470
رفرنس: دارای رفرنس در داخل متن و انتهای مقاله
فهرست مطالب (انگلیسی)

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Literature review

3. The model and hypothesis development

4. Research design and method

5. Results and discussion

Acknowledgements

Appendix A. Scale Items and Reliability Estimates

References

بخشی از مقاله (انگلیسی)

Abstract

As service firms look to international markets for growth opportunities, they often encounter consumers who have significantly different expectations and perceptions of service performance. Little is known of the relationships between service performance, price perceptions, satisfaction and behavioral outcomes in diverse cross-cultural consumer segments. Prior work also questions the equivalence in cross-cultural settings of service performance instruments developed in U.S. service environments. Using the international airline industry as the context, an industry-specific service performance instrument is developed and found invariant across Western and Asian settings. The results also reveal both similarities and differences in service performance evaluation and behavior across cultures. This study addresses the need for invariant service performance measures in order to be able to evaluate cross-cultural differences in service performance evaluation effectively; and the importance of service strategy differentiation for diverse cultural groups in international travel settings.

Introduction

International tourism services pose special challenges. These often relate to differences in consumer evaluations across nations and cultures, and dissimilar expectations and preferences as to optimal and adequate service encounters (Bolton and Myers, 2003). Service managers need to be cognizant of the parts of the service experience that are open to cultural influences, and be aware of those that remain stable across cultures. However, there are significant gaps in our understanding of the trade-offs between service performance and price in satisfaction assessment, and the role of satisfaction in influencing behavioral intentions across diverse cultures. Cross-cultural tourism research is largely limited to English-speaking countries, and requires a greater focus on cross-cultural issues in emerging markets (Cohen et al., 2014). It is important also to investigate whether there are differences in how consumers interpret and respond to service performance measures (Li, 2014). Attention to construct, data collection and measure equivalence is critical (Hult et al., 2008). Without evidence of data equivalence, interpretations of cultural differences are problematic, as it is not established that members of different groups are using the same conceptual frame of reference when responding to survey items (Riordan and Vandenberg, 1994). Studies investigating the invariance of service performance and satisfaction measures across national groups support partial measurement invariance only (e.g., Alden et al., 2010; Laroche et al., 2004).