تأثیر هزینه های تحقیق و توسعه
ترجمه نشده

تأثیر هزینه های تحقیق و توسعه

عنوان فارسی مقاله: آیا در ایالات متحده آمریکا اصول حسابداری عموما پذیرفته شده یا استانداردهای بین المللی گزارشگری مالی وجود دارد؟ درک چگونگی تأثیر هزینه های تحقیق و توسعه بر تجزیه و تحلیل نسبی
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله: Is it U.S. GAAP or IFRS? Understanding how R&D costs affect ratio analysis
مجله/کنفرانس: افق های کسب و کار – Business Horizons
رشته های تحصیلی مرتبط: حسابداری، مدیریت
گرایش های تحصیلی مرتبط: حسابداری مالی، سیاست های تحقیق و توسعه
کلمات کلیدی فارسی: استانداردهای بین المللی گزارشگری مالی، اصول حسابداری عموما پذیرفته شده ایالات متحده آمریکا، تجزیه و تحلیل صورتهای مالی، تحقیق و توسعه، حسابداری برای تحقیق و توسعه
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی: IFRS; U.S. GAAP; Financial statement analysis; Research and development; Accounting for research and development
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2019.03.011
دانشگاه: Investment Banking Analyst, Wells Fargo Securities, Graduate, Washington & Lee University
صفحات مقاله انگلیسی: 10
ناشر: الزویر - Elsevier
نوع ارائه مقاله: ژورنال
نوع مقاله: ISI
سال انتشار مقاله: 2019
ایمپکت فاکتور: 4.488 در سال 2018
شاخص H_index: 67 در سال 2019
شاخص SJR: 1.296 در سال 2018
شناسه ISSN: 0007-6813
شاخص Quartile (چارک): Q1 در سال 2018
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی: PDF
وضعیت ترجمه: ترجمه نشده است
قیمت مقاله انگلیسی: رایگان
آیا این مقاله بیس است: خیر
آیا این مقاله مدل مفهومی دارد: ندارد
آیا این مقاله پرسشنامه دارد: ندارد
آیا این مقاله متغیر دارد: ندارد
کد محصول: E13540
رفرنس: دارای رفرنس در داخل متن و انتهای مقاله
فهرست مطالب (انگلیسی)

Abstract

1. Using a different accounting standard affects financial statements

2. What are some of the major differences?

3. Accounting for research and development costs

4. Adjusting R&D costs for financial analysis

5. Results from adjusted financial statements

6. What affects the ratios

7. If you want to delve deeper

Acknowledgments

References

بخشی از مقاله (انگلیسی)

Abstract

While financial reporting standards under U.S. GAAP and IFRS are fundamentally similar, differences do exist that may affect our analysis of company financial statements. This is particularly true when comparing a U.S. company following U.S. GAAP to a firm that uses IFRS. To illustrate, we compare research and development (R&D) accounting methods under both sets of standards and illustrate how they affect the analysis of financial results of firms in a specific industry–—automotive manufacturers. Our results provide insight into settings in which differences in R&D accounting may have the greatest impact on financial analysis.

Using a different accounting standard affects financial statements

While there are numerous standard setters in the accounting world, the majority of leading companies now use either U.S. GAAP or International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). For a short while around 2008, it looked as though the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) planned to move the U.S. toward the adoption of IFRS but now convergence of the two, rather than adoption, seems to be the more likely path. James Schnurr (2015), chief accountant of the SEC, in his speech at the Baruch College Financial Reporting Conference, stated that collaborations were currently the only way for convergence. In a different speech that year at the Brooklyn Law School, SEC Commissioner Kara M. Stein (2015) said that she was “not convinced of a need to abandon U.S. GAAP in favor of IFRS.” During these collaborations, however, each body has adjusted the resulting standards to fit the perceived needs of its constituents. For example, while the standards on leases and revenue recognition both have many things in common, the differences are still very important. Understanding the differences is crucial. Even within U.S. GAAP and IFRS, there are choices that each company needs to make: what inventory flow system to adopt or what depreciation method to use. Both of these choices, as well as differing regulations, may affect the classic financial ratios that analysts and investors use to evaluate a company.