ارتباط روان پریشی و استرس
ترجمه نشده

ارتباط روان پریشی و استرس

عنوان فارسی مقاله: درک ارتباط روان پریشی و استرس در بزرگسالان در حال رشد عادی: نقش کمبودهای عاطفی
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله: Understanding the psychopathy-stress association in typical developing adults: The role of emotional deficits
مجله/کنفرانس: شخصیت و تفاوت های فردی – Personality and Individual Differences
رشته های تحصیلی مرتبط: روانشناسی
گرایش های تحصیلی مرتبط: روانشناسی عمومی، روانشناسی بالینی، روانشناسی رشد
کلمات کلیدی فارسی: استرس رفتاری، روان پریشی اولیه، روان پریشی ثانویه، مشکلات عاطفی (آلکسی تایمیا)
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی: Stress (behavioral)، Primary psychopathy، Secondary psychopathy، Emotional difficulties (alexithymia
نوع نگارش مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی (Research Article)
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.06.016
دانشگاه: Western Parana State University, Rua Bahia, 470, ap 01., 85605-270 Francisco Beltrão, PR, Brazil
صفحات مقاله انگلیسی: 6
ناشر: الزویر - Elsevier
نوع ارائه مقاله: ژورنال
نوع مقاله: ISI
سال انتشار مقاله: 2019
ایمپکت فاکتور: 2.383 در سال 2018
شاخص H_index: 141 در سال 2019
شاخص SJR: 1.245 در سال 2018
شناسه ISSN: 0191-8869
شاخص Quartile (چارک): Q1 در سال 2018
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی: PDF
وضعیت ترجمه: ترجمه نشده است
قیمت مقاله انگلیسی: رایگان
آیا این مقاله بیس است: بله
آیا این مقاله مدل مفهومی دارد: ندارد
آیا این مقاله پرسشنامه دارد: ندارد
آیا این مقاله متغیر دارد: دارد
کد محصول: E13713
رفرنس: دارای رفرنس در داخل متن و انتهای مقاله
فهرست مطالب (انگلیسی)

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Method

3. Results

4. Discussion

Declarations of interest

Funding

References

بخشی از مقاله (انگلیسی)

Abstract

This study assessed the relationships between psychopathic personality traits and perceived stress among 264 young adults. A hypothesized indirect effect of emotion and empathy deficits in the psychopathy-stress association was also investigated. Results indicated stronger associations between perceived stress with secondary psychopathy compared with primary psychopathy. Indirect effects of alexithymic traits on the relationship between stress and psychopathic personality traits were reported. Although the current study showed that both primary and secondary traits are significantly association with higher levels of self-reported stress, it is the latter which seems to be most important, lending more weight to the need to consider mental health outcomes in those with high levels of secondary psychopathy characteristics.

Introduction

The common lay concept of psychopathy is one of coolness and control. However, the empirically-derived profile of psychopathic behavior includes indications of higher stress reactivity, irritability and anger (Cleckley, 1941/1976; Patrick, 2018). Such emotion-regulation difficulties may underpin the proactive and reactive types of aggression observed (Cima & Raine, 2009). Emotional distress is both an antecedent and consequence of antisocial behaviour (Deschamps, Verhulp, de Castro, & Matthys, 2018; Garofalo, Neumann, & Velotti, 2018). High scores on psychopathy measures, along with elevated self-reported perceived stress, have been found to predict concomitant violence offending and victimization (Silver, Piquero, Jennings, Piquero, & Leiber, 2011). Although experimental evidence showing lower autonomic nervous system activation in stress reactivity and in stress recovery in psychopathic samples have been replicated (e.g., Beauchaine, Gatzke-Kopp, & Mead, 2007; Nederhof, Marceau, Shirtcliff, Hastings, & Oldehinkel, 2015; Sijtsema, Van Roon, Groot, & Riese, 2015), few studies have investigated the associations between psychopathy and perceptions of stress. Before we examine what we already know about psychopathy and stress, it is important to consider work on primary and secondary variants of psychopathy. First proposed by Karpman (1941), these variants are typically defined by low anxiety/internalizing symptoms in the case of primary psychopathy, and increased anxiety and internalizing symptoms (secondary variant), often seen alongside greater levels of traumatic experiences than those presenting with the primary subtype profile (Skeem et al., 2007; Tatar et al., 2012).