کارآفرینی دیجیتال
ترجمه نشده

کارآفرینی دیجیتال

عنوان فارسی مقاله: کارآفرینی دیجیتال: مروری بر نوشته های ساختار یافته میان رشته ای و دستورالعمل تحقیق
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله: Digital entrepreneurship: An interdisciplinary structured literature review and research agenda
مجله/کنفرانس: پیش بینی فناوری و تحولات اجتماعی – Technological Forecasting and Social Change
رشته های تحصیلی مرتبط: مدیریت
گرایش های تحصیلی مرتبط: کارآفرینی
کلمات کلیدی فارسی: کارآفرینی دیجیتال، استارتاپ دیجیتال، سرمایه گذاری اینترنتی، استارتاپ های آنلاین
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی: Digital entrepreneurship، Digital start-up، Internet venture، Digital venturing، Online start-ups
نوع نگارش مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی (Research Article)
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119735
دانشگاه: Macquarie Business School, Macquarie University, NSW 2109, Australia
صفحات مقاله انگلیسی: 20
ناشر: الزویر - Elsevier
نوع ارائه مقاله: ژورنال
نوع مقاله: ISI
سال انتشار مقاله: 2019
ایمپکت فاکتور: 4.852 در سال 2019
شاخص H_index: 93 در سال 2020
شاخص SJR: 1.422 در سال 2019
شناسه ISSN: 0040-1625
شاخص Quartile (چارک): Q1 در سال 2019
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی: PDF
وضعیت ترجمه: ترجمه نشده است
قیمت مقاله انگلیسی: رایگان
آیا این مقاله بیس است: خیر
آیا این مقاله مدل مفهومی دارد: ندارد
آیا این مقاله پرسشنامه دارد: ندارد
آیا این مقاله متغیر دارد: ندارد
کد محصول: E14604
رفرنس: دارای رفرنس در داخل متن و انتهای مقاله
فهرست مطالب (انگلیسی)

Abstract

۱٫ Introduction

۲٫ Definitions

۳٫ Methodology

۴٫ Insight

۵٫ Focus and critique

۶٫ ‘Transformative redefinitions’: the future of digital entrepreneurship

۷٫ Conclusion

Acknowledgements

Appendix 1. Articles in the dataset

Appendix 2. Supporting publications

References

بخشی از مقاله (انگلیسی)

Abstract

This paper provides a structured literature review of digital entrepreneurship to generate insights into recent developments in the field, critique the research to date, and identify opportunities for future research. We have applied the three aspects of critical research – insight, critique, and transformative redefinition – to analyse and synthesise the literature. We distil the definitions of the key constructs and identify three research development phases corresponding to practice development. Analysis of 133 scholarly articles by discipline, time, methodology, geography and theoretical focus informs that digital entrepreneurship research has been fragmented, divergent and slow to respond to practice. However, the field is now rapidly acquiring legitimacy and an identity, growing rapidly and is becoming more interdisciplinary. We explore how established views of entrepreneurial processes and clusters are being upended in a digital world. In outlining the future of the field, a preponderance of single case study and conceptual articles need to be supplemented with longitudinal, mixed methods, multiple case study and quantitative research. More integrative research, preferably presented as dynamic models, would advance the field. Design and action research output, and collaborations with practitioners will yield practice-driven insights. This paper will facilitate an interdisciplinary dialogue for evidenceinformed policy and practice.

Introduction

Industries and markets as varied as media, entertainment, advertising, retail, transport, and accommodation have been transformed by business model innovations, such as multi-sided digital marketplaces, social media, e-commerce, and software-as-a-service. This expanding digital economy owes its existence in large part to the entrepreneurial action enabled by digital technologies. In fact, companies that began as digital start-ups – Google, Facebook, Amazon, Alibaba, Dropbox, Uber, AirBNB – are now counted among the world’s corporate giants. Indeed, the digital economy is hailed as one of the most significant economic developments since the industrial revolution, and digital entrepreneurship sits squarely at the origins of this revolution (Kraus et al., 2019; Nambisan, 2019; Zhao and Collier, 2016). Although growing rapidly, academic research in digital entrepreneurship faces some challenges. The field’s dynamic terminology is a source of confusion. As trends emerge and fade, we continue to use different terms interchangeably from an emergent vocabulary (Matlay, 2004). For example, ‘internet entrepreneurship’ at the inception of the field in 2000–۲۰۰۱ led to e- and cyber entrepreneurship around 2004 and now we seem to have settled on to digital entrepreneurship.