استفاده از اندازه گیری ریاضیاتی در افزایش دقت (اعتبار)
ترجمه نشده

استفاده از اندازه گیری ریاضیاتی در افزایش دقت (اعتبار)

عنوان فارسی مقاله: استفاده از سنجش ریاضیاتی در افزایش دقت (اعتبار) و با مفهوم بودن سنجش عملکرد در کسب و کار و سازمان ها
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله: Use of mathematical measurement in improving the accuracy (reliability) & meaningfulness of performance measurement in businesses & organizations
مجله/کنفرانس: اندازه گیری – Measurement
رشته های تحصیلی مرتبط: مدیریت
گرایش های تحصیلی مرتبط: مدیریت کسب و کار، مدیریت عملکرد
کلمات کلیدی فارسی: اندازه گیری، متریک، شاخص، ویژگی های اندازه گیری، معنی داری اندازه گیری، اندازه گیری عملکرد، اندازه گیری و مدیریت عملکرد، نظریه اندازه گیری ریاضی
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی: Measure, Metric, Indicator، Measuring attributes، meaningfulness of measurement، Performance measurement، performance measurement and management، mathematical measurement theory
نوع نگارش مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی (Research Article)
نمایه: scopus – master journals – JCR
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2018.04.008
دانشگاه: Greenwich University – Department of Computing & Information Systems – Old Royal Naval College – United Kingdom
ناشر: الزویر - Elsevier
نوع ارائه مقاله: ژورنال
نوع مقاله: ISI
سال انتشار مقاله: 2018
ایمپکت فاکتور: ۲٫۲۱۸ در سال ۲۰۱۷
شاخص H_index: ۶۱ در سال ۲۰۱۸
شاخص SJR: ۰٫۷۳۳ در سال ۲۰۱۸
شناسه ISSN: 0263-2241
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی: PDF
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی: 62
وضعیت ترجمه: ترجمه نشده است
قیمت مقاله انگلیسی: رایگان
آیا این مقاله بیس است: بله
کد محصول: E10536
فهرست انگلیسی مطالب

Abstract


1- Introduction


2- Methodology


3- Results concerning the measuring attributes.


4- Discussion of the results of the articles reviewed


5- Summary and concluding remarks


References

نمونه متن انگلیسی مقاله

Abstract


A review of the academic and best practice literature indicates that while there is no shortage of publications on performance measurement systems/performance measurement and management system (PMS&PMMS) in the business and organizational perspectives, but there is a dearth of research on how to measure activities/things more precisely and how they contribute to performance using an appropriate measurement theory. Key findings of the weaknesses of PMS&PMMS are: poor definitions of terms, too many terms are used, terms are used interchangeably or tautologically, and, no clear differentiation of measurement and performance measurement (M&PM). These show that the current ways in measuring activities/things and their performance are not reliable and meaningful. To overcome these weaknesses, using mathematical formulation of the hard and soft (social) sciences, a theoretical foundation of the measuring attributes (measures, metrics, indicators) of M&PM is ensconced and empirically tested using a numerical analysis. The key of this theory is accuracy (reliability) and meaningfulness of M&PM.


Introduction


Measurement and performance measurement (M&PM) of activities and things are important for any disciplinebe it in the accounting, economic, governmental, management, social science, engineering or medical field. In the accounting, economic governmental, and management fieldcollectively known as businesses and organizations (although in some instances also include non-profit purpose firms, e.g., charities and health-care institutions) M&PM are becoming to use the alternative performance measurement systems (PMS), The growing number of PMS, the contemporary performance measurement and management system (PMMS) 1 , and its componentsthe measuring attributes of an organization, is encouraging in terms of practical significance and academic research. A measure, metric and an indicator in the PMS context are collective, termed by [26] as measuring attributes as they possess specific attributes of measurement. These attributes are vital to a measuring system as they are the ones that measure activities/things and provide valuable information on their performance within an organization, and without them, nothing can be measured and managed. PMS were introduced onto the workplace in the late 1960/early 1970 to replace accounting measures, and the accounting way of measuring performance because many practitioners expressed a general dissatisfaction with the traditional backward-looking accounting-based measurement system (AMS) (see [68], [69], [84], [73], [74], [24], [14], [16], [72], [128], [130], [145], [136], and [10]). The PMS is still largely based on the AMS control concept and is not a formal system but is a collection of many forms of measures, metrics, indicators, methods and systems of measurement and performance measurement. Academic research onto PMS follows, some twenty years later, i.e.

  • اشتراک گذاری در

دیدگاه خود را بنویسید:

تاکنون دیدگاهی برای این نوشته ارسال نشده است

استفاده از اندازه گیری ریاضیاتی در افزایش دقت (اعتبار)
نوشته های مرتبط
مقالات جدید
پیوندها