در نظر گرفتن حالت های اکولوژیکی آب در توسعه مدل کمی آب و هوایی
ترجمه نشده

در نظر گرفتن حالت های اکولوژیکی آب در توسعه مدل کمی آب و هوایی

عنوان فارسی مقاله: در نظر گرفتن حالت های اکولوژیکی آب در توسعه مدل کمی آب و هوایی ساختمان های سبز شهری با استفاده از ارزش گذاری پولی
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله: Considering water ecological aspects in developing a quantitative climatic model of urban green building using monetary valuations
مجله/کنفرانس: اقتصاد اکولوژیکی – Ecological Economics
رشته های تحصیلی مرتبط: محیط زیست، جغرافیا
گرایش های تحصیلی مرتبط: مهندسی طراحی محیط زیست، برنامه ریزی محیطی، جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی شهری
کلمات کلیدی فارسی: ساختمان سبز، سیستم رتبه بندی، ارزیابی پولی، مدیریت آب
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی: Green building, Ranking system, Monetary evaluation, Water management
نوع نگارش مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی (Research Article)
نمایه: Scopus – Master Journals List – JCR
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106562
دانشگاه: Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
ناشر: الزویر - Elsevier
نوع ارائه مقاله: ژورنال
نوع مقاله: ISI
سال انتشار مقاله: 2020
ایمپکت فاکتور: 4.535 در سال 2019
شاخص H_index: 174 در سال 2020
شاخص SJR: 1.767 در سال 2019
شناسه ISSN: 0921-8009
شاخص Quartile (چارک): Q1 در سال 2019
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی: PDF
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی: 10
وضعیت ترجمه: ترجمه نشده است
قیمت مقاله انگلیسی: رایگان
آیا این مقاله بیس است: خیر
آیا این مقاله مدل مفهومی دارد: ندارد
آیا این مقاله پرسشنامه دارد: ندارد
آیا این مقاله متغیر دارد: ندارد
کد محصول: E14172
رفرنس: دارای رفرنس در داخل متن و انتهای مقاله
فهرست انگلیسی مطالب

Abstract


1- Introduction


2- Methods and materials


3- Implementation


4- Results and discussions


5- Conclusion


Acknowledgments


Appendix A.


References

نمونه متن انگلیسی مقاله

Abstract


The need to respect environmental considerations in terms of resource consumption and harmful production has led to formulate regulations for green building. While some countries have started developing green building rating systems, some others are following the existing systems. Iran does not comply with any of the existing systems due to political reasons and does not utilize such a system officially. The purpose of this study is to add environmental water attitudes to Madad’s Green Building Model, which was developed solely on the basis of environmental climatic factors. The model of each city is a function of its climatic and demographic conditions and is implemented on the basis of expert advice and AHP methodology. The results of the monetary valuation studies were used to improve the selection of indicators and to accurately define their weighting in the model. The indicators in the current study are to reduce runoff volume, water consumption, and the reuse of grey-water. The assessment results of the study area showed that only 11% of these green building capabilities had been used.


Introduction


The urban population has grown twice in compare with the rural population since 1950 (United Nations, 2015). The strong growth in the concentration of the urban population is leading to a deep degradation of the environment, which is more intense in developing countries (El Araby, 2002). Recognizing the energy efficiency factors of the urban buildings is crucial to create opportunities for reducing energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions under climatic conditions (Zhou et al., 2018). For this reason, since the early 1990s, most countries have either developed their own green building rating systems or followed one of the existing systems (Madad et al., 2019). Surveys of some of the world’s best-known green building systems reveal a common priority in reducing energy consumption, which will automatically lead to a reduction in carbon dioxide emissions (Chen et al., 2015).


Although the development of these green building rating systems has been viewed as a good step towards environmental polarization, the criteria and assessments of these systems should also be based on local climatic conditions (Madad et al., 2019). The second important gap in the development of green building systems is the selection of appropriate criteria and weighing methods, which are usually selected based on the views and tastes of experts and their past experiences rather than the quantitative calculations and precise Monetary Evaluations (ME). The lack of using ME in the selection of criteria and the weighting of the model is due to the lack of full coverage of monetary studies on all environmental factors (HK-BEAM, 2004).

  • اشتراک گذاری در

دیدگاه خود را بنویسید:

تاکنون دیدگاهی برای این نوشته ارسال نشده است

در نظر گرفتن حالت های اکولوژیکی آب در توسعه مدل کمی آب و هوایی
نوشته های مرتبط
مقالات جدید
لوگوی رسانه های برخط

logo-samandehi

پیوندها